Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: dmanLA
Ok. So how do you calibrate a 68 million year dating method?

Use different methods and see if they give the same answer. Cross check those answers against other data, such as the known rate of geological and biological processes such as gene-clocks. Further cross-check assumptions such as the constant rate of atomic decay and constant lightspeed by observing atomic decay rates in distant supernovae. Numerous different methods of calculating this stuff come up with the same answers (within reasonable experimental error) every time.

1,105 posted on 05/03/2006 10:06:22 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Miraculous explanations are just spasmodic omphalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies ]


To: Thatcherite

Further cross-check assumptions such as the constant rate of atomic decay and constant lightspeed by observing atomic decay rates in distant supernovae.



Constant speed of light may be a bad assumption...

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/~dzuba/varyc.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2181455.stm

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/08/07/australia.lightspeed/


1,277 posted on 05/04/2006 2:27:10 PM PDT by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson