[Right Wing Professor]

. And it's not necessary for a scientist to have an opinion in the matter one way or the other...At the same time, no scientist ought to be theologizing: that belongs to religious people and philosophers.

Scientists frequently do have opinions on the matter. They're allowed. And they're also allowed to bring their knowledge of the universe, gleaned from science, to bear on philosophy, and to have the opinion that theology is an empty and anachronistic pursuit.

[Virginia-American]

...and to have the opinion that theology is an empty and anachronistic pursuit. ...

I'm surprised tht Dawkins hasn't yet been recognized as the greatest theologian of the late 20th - early 21st century. He should at least have a few honorary drs. of div.

[betty boop]

Scientists frequently do have opinions on the matter. They're allowed. And they're also allowed to bring their knowledge of the universe, gleaned from science, to bear on philosophy, and to have the opinion that theology is an empty and anachronistic pursuit....

That theology is "an empty and anachronistic pursuit" is an opinion, Professor. It is not a scientifically validated fact.