Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Speak for yourself.

I am. You don't see Tom Cruise mentioned there do you?

So do people in mental institutions.

Since you deny being a mind reader(or so it seems), you must be speaking as an example of a person in a mental institution.

In other words, you CAN'T or WON'T back up your silly claims.

Won't, and silly is your contention.

Dr Sternberg was treated shabbily.

I presented Dr. Sternberg's side of the story and he was there, the blogger wasn't so it is a refutation.

Your "source"

Name:  Daniel Morgan (a.k.a. Brother Danny)
Home:  Gainesville, FL

Ph.D.-seeking chemistry grad student at UF

President, AAFSA at UF, contributor, Debunking Christianity, blogger profile, webpage, facebook, email

AAFSA = Atheist, Agnostic and Freethinking Student Association at UF (Gainesville, FL)

Plus martyr and treated shabbily are not synonymous. You're too easy.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."

1,196 posted on 05/03/2006 8:28:23 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1188 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
"Speak for yourself.

I am. "

So, you admit you are NOT an example of integrity? That's the first step to recovery. Admitting you have a problem. :)

"Won't, and silly is your contention.

Dr Sternberg was treated shabbily.

I presented Dr. Sternberg's side of the story and he was there, the blogger wasn't so it is a refutation."

So, you have nothing to refute the facts that the blogger presented? I see.

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

And yet you claim it has been falsified. Curious.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.
1,197 posted on 05/03/2006 8:32:50 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies ]

To: AndrewC
I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."

I am an archaeologist. I found a pre-Cambrian hominid.

Get back to me if you are interested.

1,204 posted on 05/03/2006 9:59:51 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Creationists know Jack Chick about evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson