[CarolinaGuitarman]

"So, you admit you are NOT an example of integrity? That's the first step to recovery. Admitting you have a problem.

No."

Uh oh, your recovery just hit a bump. You already admitted you had no integrity (I told you to speak for yourself when you told me I had no integrity, and you said you WERE speaking for yourself). Don't lose everything you've gained by denying it now. Remember, one day at a time, keep it simple; the first year is a gift.

"It should be curious, since I made no such claim."

Sure you did; you said that evidence against evolution exists but is suppressed.

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

And I repeat: That is logically incompatible with saying that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.

We have to give it away to keep it.
Surrender to become Victorious.

[ahayes]

I contend AndrewC has a guinea pig living atop his liver.

[AndrewC]

You already admitted you had no integrity

You truly are delusional. I negated the statement "Oh you fine example of integrity". That certainly is not a mention of no integrity. And I was "speaking" FOR myself, which is not "Speaking" OF myself. Only someone as delusional as you are, would confuse "OF" and "FOR"

Sure you did; you said that evidence against evolution exists but is suppressed.

Again, you are delusional. This is the statement I made " Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed." That does not state, in any fashion, that any theory or dogma has been falsified.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."