That's what he said. You even quoted him!
Let's not let facts get in the way of an opinion.
You missed my point 2nsdammit, which is: By what standard can we say that RWP's opinion is any more valuable than anyone else's in the matter, such that his opinion shall be "favored" and even institutionalized (which obviously some people are trying to do these days, in law and public life) and all the others "condemned and supressed?"
Sorry I did not make this clearer the first time around. Thanks for writing.