Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan; Antonello; DaveLoneRanger

If soft-tissue in a dino bone proves dinos aren't that old, then all of the other dino bones should be only partially fossilised like this one. Am I right?


797 posted on 05/02/2006 4:09:57 PM PDT by stands2reason ("Patriotism is the highest form of dissent." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason; PatrickHenry; Doctor Stochastic; Ichneumon; Alamo-Girl; betty boop

what I find amusing is these folks seem to think that "soft tissue" surviving 60-odd million years is a significantly harder trick than it surviving a mere 6000 years - when practical experience indicates it is odd for any soft tissue to survive longer than a few days to a few years.

decomp is a hungry process, don't'cha know?

That EITHER timeline occured indicates a highly peculiar condition thoroughly inimical to fungi and bacteria - any such condition which could permit a 6000 year survival would, if it endured undisturbed, permit a 60-million year survival.

stasis is STASIS.

...and these YEC folks just gloss right over that, so hungry to bloviate that their brains shut right down.


1,002 posted on 05/02/2006 9:52:01 PM PDT by King Prout (many complain I am overly literal... this would not be a problem if fewer people were under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 797 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson