Precisely what I wrote, "This evidence should not be noteworthy, but it is."
This is to be viewed in light of the charge that ID is non-falsifiable. I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed. Yet this evidence is noteworthy in the eyes of many and not due to any reason of its expectation.
I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable. Any evidence contrary to the dogma will be marginalized and ridiculed.
This is a contradiction.