[MississippiMan]

LOL at the classic, so predictable evolutionist response: Instead of considering the common-sense answer for a nano-instant and saying, "Hmmm, maybe these things aren't as old as we thought," they without hesitation go directly to the most ridiculously unlikely scenario and start explaining how soft tissue managed to hang around for 65 million years. A CLASSIC example of the blind loyalty to evolution. When the next paradigm breaks down, we'll see the same thing again.

An evolutionist will twist heaven and Earth (pun intended) to stay within the framework, no matter the contortions required. And will have the gall to laugh at a creationist for being unscientific.

Satan's scales are thick and tight.

MM

[RunningWolf]

Bookmark

An evolutionist will twist heaven and Earth (pun intended) to stay within the framework, no matter the contortions required.

Satan's scales are thick and tight

Man you have that calibrated pretty well!

W.

[jennyp]

LOL at the classic, so predictable evolutionist response: Instead of considering the common-sense answer for a nano-instant and saying, "Hmmm, maybe these things aren't as old as we thought," they without hesitation go directly to the most ridiculously unlikely scenario and start explaining how soft tissue managed to hang around for 65 million years. A CLASSIC example of the blind loyalty to evolution. When the next paradigm breaks down, we'll see the same thing again.

Given the fact of soft tissue preserved in this T. rex, there are two possibilities:

1. All those different radiometric techniques that all agree that the geological strata in which the T. rex was found was 65 million years old, are wrong. Or...
   
   
2. This thing that "everyone just knows" - that soft tissue couldn't possibly be preserved for millions of years - is wrong.

Gee. I wonder which "fact" a reasonable person should be more willing to abandon?

Satan's scales are thick and tight.

Haw haw haw!