No, I am asking for reasoned debate. Accusing someone of pedophilic rape is not debate. It is childish. It is puerile. It’s verbal bullying. How can anyone have any kind of a reasoned debate when one side insists on such childish, rhetorical tactics? If anyone wants to quash dissent it is those who use such tactics. Who is more censorious then, the person who points out the verbal bullying or the person doing the bullying?
The fact that you think keywords... WORDS themselves quash dissent shows how little faith you have in the reader’s ability to discern what the writer meant.
Without using words, no point can be made.
Can I see a FULL list of the words you disagree with? If you DO write them out for me, I’ll know which words YOU are censoring. Thanks.