Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Bingo!
They pulled this crap all the time during Clinton.
The second has obviously been photoshopped from the first. You can overlay the wto (in phtoshop, for example) and they are identical. Noone can do that with two images, separately taken.
LOL! I keep glancing at my cold, empty coffee mug, and thinking.....thinking...not gonna do it....not gonna do it...
If this document turns out to be authentic then I suggest that Barack Hussein Obama’s birthday (Aug. 4th) become an American holiday celebrating American conservatism and our Constitution!
This will be the day that we all defended ourselves from the enemy within.
I agree.
For that reason, this warrants a call to the embassy this week, I’m thinking.
Everyone he has appointed to his cabinet would be illegitimate to right?
So who would become the leader of this country? Would it be given over to McCain/Palin?
hmm...maybe that’s why Palin stepped down from her governorship early :)!
Also, the fake old torn one’s edges are to uniformly jagged. Also the tear itself is fake. No real tear looks like that and it certainly would not have the same jagged edges as the sides of the document.
Some person who went into PACER and downloaded the filed document. Anyone can do it. See my post #259.
Looks like the usual trolls have been caught napping on this—literally!
I need sleep...
wto = two
phtoshop = photoshop
Your right these are not two different versions... And no, the photos were not taken at different times. The second photo is a Photoshopped hack of the first document. Contrast enhanced and image darken, background cut away and made black, and a sloppy Torn Edges filter job.
Whoever done it, was not very good. ;^)
Allan Keyes has perhaps earned his keep today.
Democrat and Republican alike have been in favor of such a thing for years. I'm looking for the Feinstein one. Here are others:
H.J. Res. 59 - Citizen for 35 years
Sponsored by Vic Snyder of Arkansas, with 6 co-sponsors:
Mr. CONYERS: Mr. Speaker, today I am introducing a proposed amendment to the Constitution of the United States that will enable all citizens of this country to be eligible to hold the Office of President.
Congressional Record, Page E1692, Sept. 4, 2003 (speaking on Sept 3)
On the introduction of S.J. Res. 15 - Citizen for 20 years
S.J.Res. 15 had no cosponsors, but there were hearings on 10/5/2004.
Mr. HATCH: Mr. President, I rise today to introduce the "Equal Opportunity to Govern" Amendment, which would amend the Constitution to permit any person who has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years to be eligible for the Office of President.
Congressional Record, Page S9252, July 10, 2003
You’re a champ, kiddo.
I’m in the Mountain time zone. I haven’t been to bed yet, either.
It’s 6:43 here. Gonna be a “lost day” tomorrow for me. LOL
but....the reward! :)
Ann was too young to have conferred NBC status per 1952 law in place at the time. Zero simply doesn’t make the grade according to the law. And we all know he believes in the “Rule of Law,” don’t we?
The thought just crossed my mind that Obama was a bad boy when he ran for the Senate also
It looks as if the second one is an enhanced contrast version of the first. The zigzags are artifacts, not perforations. The ‘tear’ appears to be as well.
7:43 am here, and still not in bed. Got to go soon, before any one else wakes up and finds out LOL.
I think I agree. It would be very unlikely that photographs on two separate occasions would be taken at eaxctly EXACTLY the same angle, with exactly the same lighting, resulting in exaclty the same shadow formations.
The edges are not mere pixellations, but are intentional editing as you suggest. I don’t know what they were after, but I’d suggest that the second version be tossed. This image has been manipulated as you suggest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.