[John Valentine]

That is what she says in her filing with the court.

You have to go with what you have. This certainly ought to be enough to get the letters rogatory that she is asking for to authenticate the information.

“The undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs has acquired possession of a color copy of one certain document (attached as Exhibit A to this motion), regarding which there are no ready means of authentication except by recovery of the original document. As should be apparent from the nature and content of the document, if authenticated, and shown to be genuine, the contents of this document will significantly narrow and shorten the discovery and pre-trial litigation period necessary in this case, and might lead to an early resolution by settlement or transfer of these proceedings to the United States House of Representatives and Senate according the procedures outlined in the Constitution.”

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018712/03118509264

[TheBigIf]

This is a little dis-heartening. That she does not have the actual document is troubling.

[SE Mom]

That’s an enormous disappointment. If Orly doesn’t have possession of the doc, then authentication is impossible.

This is much too vital a piece of paper to go out on a limb for without having possession.

[Windflier]

“The undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs has acquired possession of a color copy of one certain document (attached as Exhibit A to this motion), regarding which there are no ready means of authentication except by recovery of the original document."

Well, that's just great. Wonder where the actual hard copy document is, and how they're going to "recover" it?

More questions...sheeesh...