To: Red Steel
They probably, out of exuberance, printed all govt docs with “Republic” as soon as they declared Independence. They sure didn't want to continue with anything that had Britain associated with it. I was just looking at the time-line.
252 posted on
08/02/2009 3:12:39 AM PDT by
voveo
To: voveo
Possibly.
A good way to find out would be to find other paperwork from that era and see if it bears the same “Republic” seal at the top.
269 posted on
08/02/2009 3:15:35 AM PDT by
PowerPro
(2009 - Conservative Revolution Reborn (Go Palin!))
To: voveo
They probably, out of exuberance, printed all govt docs with Republic as soon as they declared Independence. They sure didn't want to continue with anything that had Britain associated with it. I was just looking at the time-line. Yup, that's the most likely scenario.
To: voveo
That’s my thinking.
Anything that had Great Britain associated with it could very likely have been destroyed very close to the time of independence.
So even if the “Republic of Kenya” was officially established late 64, they had to have SOMETHING on their paperwork that mentions “Kenya” in some form.
The sequence number at the top of the doc is 495. That’s pretty low, an indication that the forms were recently printed.
293 posted on
08/02/2009 3:25:00 AM PDT by
djf
(The "racism" spiel is a crutch, those who unashamedly lean on it, cripples!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson