” Furthermore, it’s quite plausible that once Ann actually had this Kenyan birth certificate in her hands, and the divorce was granted on March 20, her attorney, George Kerr, counseled her on Hawaiian birth certificate “loopholes” and told her how to file for a Hawaiian “Certificate of Delayed Birth” to get Welfare or OTHER support for young Obama as a child of a non-supporting foreign national.
As Hawaiian law allows, that CODB could have been “upgraded” later to a “Certificate of Live Birth” in the 60s or 70s, which would then be a “root document” of the shorter “Certification of Live Birth” we see today presented as proof of birth from Barack Hussein Obama II.”
Then how do you explain the long standing contemporaneous birth announcement in two Hawaiian newspapers on microfilm in multiple Hawaiian libraries?
“Also, the two Honolulu newspapers report that they carried brief announcements of the birth of a boy to the Obamas in 1961. Said the Aug. 13 birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser: “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy, son, Aug. 4.””
http://www.kansascity.com/437/story/1359646.html
Simply, this tells me Obama WAS born in early August of 1961 in Hawaii and this Kenyan document on this thread has a VERY high credibility problem! What is the purpose of its falsification?
Where to focus? There is probably something else VERY embarrassing on the long form birth certificate and the Occidental College records. Focus on that.
We don't know specifically who placed those announcements in those papers. That they appear is not under dispute.
If they were placed as a normal administrative function of a hospital in Honolulu, then that argues convincingly that Obama was born at the place and time that he claims.
If they were placed by a relative of Obama's, say by his grandparents, then they are meaningless.
This is why we need to see his long-form birth certificate.
Around here we focus on ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that could be damaging to Hussein. We multi-task with the best.