The detractors have a weak argument and nowhere near conclusive to what they are alluding.
The detractors have a weak argument and nowhere near conclusive to what they are alluding.
Well I admit it is an argument, but as you say, it’s pretty weak.
Many of the African nations were notoriously proud of dissolving the ties that represented colonial past. It would not surprise me in the least if they were, early on in the process, having docs printed that said “Republic of Kenya”
Just for arguments sake, what would it mean if this Joshua Oduya were alive, and somebody walked up to him with a copy of this and asked him “Did you sign this?” and he answers “Yes!”
Then all the frustration and moaning and groaning about 63 versus 64 versus Kenya versus Republic of Kenya is meaningless.
Give it some time, folks.
Another thread on another website is reporting that WND has copies of BC’s from Kenya from this very same time frame and they call themselves “Republic of Kenya”