Thanks, I saw that earlier, it was debunked I believe as to the type font.
My concern is the form fonts themselves, they look too modern for 1964, I'm not referring to the typing on the form.
Has anyone addressed this one way or another??
I believe the form type itself would have been from a printing press, not a typewriter.
These were British Colonies, so its not like this area was being run by naked tribal chiefs in their tents on typewriters.