Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Onerom99; null and void; pissant; LucyT; mojitojoe; BP2
The one font a DU’er was harping about that was said to be invented in 1995 was debunked as some of the numbers did not match.

Thanks, I saw that earlier, it was debunked I believe as to the type font.

My concern is the form fonts themselves, they look too modern for 1964, I'm not referring to the typing on the form.

Has anyone addressed this one way or another??

3,681 posted on 08/02/2009 4:55:08 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Move over NetZero - Obama's in the house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3660 | View Replies ]


To: Las Vegas Ron

I believe the form type itself would have been from a printing press, not a typewriter.

These were British Colonies, so its not like this area was being run by naked tribal chiefs in their tents on typewriters.


3,767 posted on 08/02/2009 5:20:33 PM PDT by Onerom99 (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3681 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson