[Eye of Unk]

I think someone made a copy for security reasons and have the original in a very safe place, what we have been seeing may be a cleaned up copy on new modern paper. What do you think?

[Cringing Negativism Network]

I think the folds on those two documents are identical.

One of those two it would seem, has been altered somehow?

[cycle of discernment]

Where did you find the pic with the tear at the upper right?

[John Valentine]

Mr. Unk, you have not been following the story line too closely. Salamander made that copy qwith photoshop in an attemtp to make it more readable. He has since apologized for the confusion caused.

[BIGLOOK]

Check out #4347.

Very interesting, Eye of Unk. Where'd ya find it?

[circumbendibus]

bookmark!

[Electric Graffiti]

Eye of Unk can you pull your picture off of photobucket. (if that’s your account?) It’s starting another 100 posters down this insane path again. Thanks. Salamander will be relieved also ;)

[autumnraine]

I think you are very very right. That right image has frayed edges, and a tear at the top.

I think they are working with the photocopy and have the original under tight lock and key.

[Deepest End]

This is a distraction. Image admittedly modified by FReeper Salamander and long since dismissed. Ignore it!

[Las Vegas Ron]

No, no, no.

A fellow FReeper made the image on the right in an attempt to clean it up to see it better and remove the back round, that's why it is torn. He is admittedly not Photoshop adept

Please pass this along!!

[Technical Editor]

Same document, different filters. Look at the folds. The same areas pouf out and the same areas are recessed. It’s the very same document, with just different light effects.