The State of Hawaii sent the announcements to the newspapers.
_______________
if that is the case, can you explain why the announcement for the Nordyke twins that were born on the same day was not in the paper? Or was it? and the microfilm was tampered with removing their and substituting it with Obama’s?
I keep reading the State of Hawai’i sent announcements to the newspaper, the implication being this is the ONLY way an announcement would appear. Five points:
1. How do we know this to be true?
2. If true, is there any reason why the paper wouldn’t accept an announcement from a proud grandparent or party other than State of Hawai’i? Or that the State would accept information- even verbal from Granny Dunham and relay the information to the paper?
3. I thought there was evaluation somewhere that indicated the announcement was modified. Don’t have a link- lost.
4. If the announcement was modified, is there a way it could have been copied onto microfilm for storage or the microfilm altered/replaced?
5. Why are so many people insisting a newspaper birth announcement confirms or validates his heretofore unsubstantiated birthplace claim, in lieu the primary source document of a birth certificate?
The last point makes no sense. Why go with a newspaper account, [we KNOW how accurate they can be, lol], rather than a primary document?
I can only conclude that whatever ‘vital records’ are extant in Hawai’ian files, none are of a nature to establish Obama’s NBC bona fides.
funny - I like starting my morning reads with a bit of gallows humor. tx
jg
one more coffin nail...