It was not the same form. And it was not a forgery, it was nothing more than a joke. A forgery has to have at least some chance of being taken seriously.
The background, made to look like alter-proof paper, said over and over again, in Dutch, something like "This is not a government document. It is meant for amusement only. Obama is your President for another three and a half years. Get used to it"
No one can call this a forgery. It is merely a satire.
Yes, that’s the one. You’re right it was on Dutch paper. But did it have any of the same names on there, e.g. registrar etc as on the Kenyan BC.
Like I said, the Kenyan BC can be easily disproved if it’s a fake. I mean the first thing is to go to this book it references, and look up the page number etc. where the birth is recorded.
But of course, that could have been altered by now, so you would have to look at the signatures and the people listed.
I find it believeable that the document was obtained for divorce and was probably on file in some Hawaii courthouse and someone copied it, but if you look at it, it looks like it’s an original with the seal embossed.
Then it was stolen from the court files?
Very strange.