The Bomford image also appears to be of an image of A4 paper, assuming that there is more cut off from the top than there was from the sides (which may or may not be a good assumption). However, from what I can see, Australia didn't adopt A4 as a standard size paper until the 1970s, whereas this document is supposedly from the early sixties.
If the Bomford image is legitimate and the Taitz image is derived from it, I have to wonder why a forger would change the hardest part by far (the folds are nowhere near a match), but wouldn't bother to change some of the simplest items such as the control numbers.
Be that as it may, the most important bits are the original file documents in a cabinet somewhere, not these derived certificates which merely serve as pointers to the original documents. Like the Hawaiian documents, what we need are the actual documentation, not just these certifications of those primary documents' existence.
What kind of paper is Kenyan on and when did they adopt it?