[Houghton M.]

Please look at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308435/posts?page=649#649

I checked the website and the information is there—he’s not a DU plant.

This seems very telling against the Taitz document. The Bomford registry book and page numbers roughly match what were used in Australia in the 1950s and 1960s.

Since they also appear on the Taitz document referring to suppposed Kenya registry books, there’s a really big problem with the Taitz document.

She must not have a paper copy but was sent a digital copy by the same DU hoaxers who did the Bomford document.

Or am I missing something?

[editor-surveyor]

We’ve already completely demolished all this Bomford crap! (on the main thread)

It appears that he was even convicted of fraud last week in Australia.

[hoosiermama]

You’re missing something.