Welcome to FR.
IF Dr Taitz finds the original record in London, then the veracity of all other documents and/or images of other documents of unknown origin is moot.
The only genuine record is the original on file in London (or perhaps Kenya). She can then return with (or better, have a copy sent directly to the judge) a bullet-proof certified paper copy, properly signed and sealed by British authorities.
As far as I know, the current Kenyan BC is nothing more that a photo of a paper document. Even if it were a paper document, the lack of a proper provenance makes it suspect.
If we’ve learned nothing else in the past year+ it’s trust nothing that’s only on the web!
Consider what it will mean if provenance shows the document comes from 1964, BUT it is in fact a fake from that era! What was it invented to cover up, all the way back in 1964?
There is no original in London.
Someone released photos of the birth certificate on the same bedspread that the one we are looking at is in and had an old typewriter, a shilling coin to make the seal and big writing “You’ve been punk’d” on it.
We have, officially, been punk’d.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2309830/posts?page=1#1