Sorry, but Indiana was wrong about Wong. As you’ve shown several times, the lack of citizenship was an important element in the decision and it only reached the conclusion because the parents were permanent immigrants who didn’t have temporary allegiance. You posted all the citations that prove this and just ignore these facts in favor of a glossy misunderstanding of the decision. The Indiana court didn’t hear full arguments and made a nonbinding inclusion of its own argument, which is moot to its actual decision. You know as well as I that sloppy work like this gets overturned. This judge is safe, because this part wasn’t binding. The judge would have been better served to write a letter to the editor of the local paper.
No, the parents did not have to be permanent immigrants. Look at that Diaz cite in Indiana. Red Steel provided a link. In Diaz, an illegal Mexican fathered two kids while he was here and was being deported for being here illegally. The Federal Appeals Court said his kids were natural born citizens.
Wong’s parents were here legally. The Mexican wasn’t. IT DON’T MATTER CAUSE THE KIDS WAS BORN HERE IN THE GOOD OLD USA!
parsy, whose fingers are tired