Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

Have you read the Wong case yet?

Diaz was here illegally. He was headed home to Mexico. The Wong parents were here legally. I have shown you the relevant language from Wong at least once, maybe twice or more.

At least you seen to be reading Diaz. Note the stuff that wasn’t there-—Because the Petitioner is attempting to stay here permanently-—

That’s cause it was relevant. Born here=natural born citizen.

Again from Indiana:

The Birthers: Contrary to the thinking of most people on the subject, there’s a very clear distinction between a ‘citizen of the United States’ and a ‘natural born citizen.’(page 12)

REALITY as promulgated by the Indiana Court:

Based upon the language of Art. II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “Natural Born Citizens” for Art. II, section 1. purposes, regardless of the citizenship of the parents.” (Page 17)

parsy, who wishes you would just learn to trust me!


1,944 posted on 02/27/2010 10:17:05 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1940 | View Replies ]


To: parsifal

Try again, parsy, it’s very easy to do ...

“You were right, edge919. I apologize for doubting you.”


1,948 posted on 02/27/2010 10:21:19 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1944 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson