This is true because the Wong court did not directly say it. BUT, it is contained in the analysis of the law by the Wong course.
Wong wasn't pronounced a natural born by the Justice GrAy because it was obvious he was not and only that he was a "native" born. At least your little Indiana court admitted to that fact that the Supreme Court did not say he was an NBC. Other than that, the Indiana court is just dead wrong like you. The Wong opinion created a whole new class of citizens the anchor babies by disregarding the original intent of the 14th Amendment Furthermore, the silly Indiana court if it had properly researched Supreme Court set precedent, it would not have embarrassed itself with opinionated dribble. Their liberal predisposition and lack of internal fortitude was just too overwhelming for them to ignore.
As an example, Ms Hand Purse, below is the Supreme Court declaring a citizen of the US under the 14th Amendment:
- - - --- - - - - -
Kawakita v. United States
No. 570
Argued April 2-3, 1952
Decided June 2, 1952
343 U.S. 717
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
-snip-
At petitioner's trial for treason, it appeared that originally he was a native-born citizen of the United States and also a national of Japan by reason of Japanese parentage and law.
-snip-
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Petitioner, a national both of the United States and of Japan, was indicted for treason, the overt acts relating to his treatment of American prisoners of war. He was
convicted of treason after a jury trial, see 96 F.Supp. 824, and the judgment of conviction was affirmed. 190 F.2d 506. The case is here on certiorari. 342 U.S. 932.
First. The important question that lies at the threshold of the case relates to expatriation. Petitioner was born in this country in 1921 of Japanese parents who were citizens of Japan. He was thus a citizen of the United States by birth, Amendment XIV, § 1 and, by reason of Japanese law, a national of Japan. See Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U. S. 81, 320 U. S. 97.
-end snip-
- - - - - - -
This is a clear cut example to what is a native born v. a natural born citizen according to the concordance and usage of the Supreme Court. You'll further note Kawakita was a duel citizen and therefore noway this guy with duel allegiances could ever be an natural born citizen.
It's no denying it, your Indiana court opinion that you cherish sooooo much is all poppycock in the words of a fellow Obot of yours.
Expatriation was and is a right. I will read the case later. I am having to type in bed pretty much today and it has slowed me down. We shall see about Wong. The anchor baby thing is a problem. Looks to me like we need to keep illegals out when they are gravid, if female, and “lovey”, if male.
Why I think we need to amnesty those who are here, and set about to securing the borders like should be simple common sense. OTOH, the mexkins will end up being a conservative core in the future. And, they are Christians, unlike what the Europeans are going to have to deal with...
parsy, who is enjoying all the legal stuff