[edge919]

No. The English courts used “subjects” because they had a king. Since we based the meaning on English law, for the point that where you were born is what mattered and not who your parents were, “the concept crossed the Atlantic”, and we put in “citizen” for “subject”.

One more time for you, only slower to help you figure it out. 'So, Obama is a natural born subject AND a natural born citizen??' Obama's Web site says his birth was governed by British law ... do you get it now??

This is true because the Wong court did not directly say it. BUT, it is contained in the analysis of the law by the Wong course.

I didn't see anything cite from the Wong "course" that supported the conclusion made by the Hoosier half-wits, I mean Indiana court. I certainly found plenty, like you showed previously that undermines their misunderstanding of Wong.

That is one reason why I keep gigging bp2 on “Blackstone”.

What on Earth does that have to do with what I posted?? Focus, friend, focus. I haven't said anything about Blackstone.

[parsifal]

If you didn’t find it, you weren’t looking hard enough. It ain’t like it ain’t smeared all through out. And, I can see by your expression, the impact of the Hoosier Halfwits has set in.

parsy, who says, Sunday Morning’s Coming Down....