Absolutely right, however, prepare yourself for the “you can’t read” shtick or the “nuh uh” shtick or the “Wong’s been cited 1,000 times” shtick (without regard to none being cited to make a British-Kenyan-Hawaiian-Indonesian-Native-psuedo African- and maybe part-U.S. citizen eligible for president).
You can’t read. Go back to number 1887, which is like the 3rd or 4th time I posted this. It’s like the Bible. Jesus said “Obey the Commandments”-—when he said that he “adopted” and “affirmed” the language of the 10 Commandments.” When you read the 1O C’s, it says “Thou shalt not kill”.
“Murder” is killing, so the intelligent person realizes that Jesus would not want us to murder someone. But, I am not sure Jesus ever comes right out and says, himself, THOU SHALT NOT MURDER!
But, if a Birther arguments applies, since Jesus didn’t say it directly, we can’t be sure. And, the commandments say “kill” not “murder” so how do we realy know Jesus wouldn’t approve of us murdering people...
See how silly this is getting. That’s what you guys are doing. Ignoring the language, ignoring the holding, and flatly refusing to use basic reading and comprehension skills. Plus, you have a 2009 Indiana case, which clearly and distinctly confirms my take on this.
parsy, who thinks you need to re-read the case and look for all that “natural born” stuff