Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
You’re not processing, curiosity. Nobody “forgot” anything. The response was double-checked by the director of the OIP, whose specific task was to find out if the answer was correct.

There's just one little problem: you have no proof that a failure to write "if any" necessarily indicates that a record exists. All you have is an OPI opinion advising the police department. It's not even an opinion about vital record requests, for crying out loud!

2,214 posted on 03/01/2010 8:48:45 AM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1984 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity

Did you bother to read the UIPA Manual which was linked in “Red Flags”? Did you bother to read the OIP Opinion Letter which showed that the process to find out whether a denial of access is proper begins by the OIP attorney actually seeing the document in question - and the statement that UIPA only applies to records which exist? That’s right in that OIP letter.

Compare that OIP Opinion Letter with what Tsukiyama and Joesting sent Terri K and you will see that the responses that they gave are confirmation that the document exists - since you CAN’T give a UIPA denial for a record which doesn’t exist.

I’m not going to waste time arguing with you though. Anybody who is capable of seeing will see; those who refuse to see won’t see no matter what I put in front of them.


2,236 posted on 03/01/2010 11:17:40 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson