[fireman15]

So we are sticking with December 29, 1956 then? From your previous email, "Because if you actually were able to check, you would have discovered that two members of my class were born on December 19th, 1956."

I do not have time to go back over all of your previous posts and quote them, but you have given several contradictory figures and characterizations of your relative age to the other graduates of the class of 1978. You are a fraud. An official inquiry may have already been started and I am not going to provide information that could compromise that, but I will tell you that there are currently 21 living members of the class of 1978 who were born either on or after December 29, 1956. My sources are unquestionable. This does not correspond with previous accounts that you have given.

[EnderWiggins]

"So we are sticking with December 29, 1956 then? From your previous email, "Because if you actually were able to check, you would have discovered that two members of my class were born on December 19th, 1956." "

It's always been the 29th. That was a typo in the PM. I would have caught it if PMs had a "preview" function before they were sent. So yes... the 29th is the date.

"but I will tell you that there are currently 21 living members of the class of 1978 who were born either on or after December 29, 1956."

Pretending for a second that your numbers there are correct (They are not, by the way. But you and I both know you never checked), then you are admitting here that all of your previous objections turned out to be equally bogus. You insisted (for example) that I could not have been a member of that class at all. You even made up the fake "fact" that in 1961 only one state would have allowed a child born after Dec 31st to enter Kindergarten that year. We both knew you were making that up since there is no way for you to have checked such a thing, but how then do you now account for the sudden about face claiming there were about 20 of them in my single college class?

I understand now the intensity with which you seek to expose people for "making up details." It's like the Anti-Gay California assemblyman outed today. It is a common side effect of self loathing that you attack in others that which you know to be true about yourself.

Have a nice day.