it doesnt matter— if 2 witness stand up in court and say the doc. is real— then obama will have to prove other wise- a witness is the strongest thing in the court of law.. under the treason law i posted earlier, it just takes 2 witnesses to say its real, and thats it
Which two witnesses did you have in mind, for example, that would swear to have personal knowledge of the authenticity of Lucas Smith's document? Who in the US can swear under oath to the authenticity of an image of a 1961 Kenyan document?
Smith can only attest to how he obtained it, not whether it is authentic. I don't believe that any such witnesses can be found in the US. They would have to be smuggled out of Kenya in fear for their lives, I suspect.
Under the FRE, only Kenyan officials can authenticate a certified Kenya BC to be placed in evidence in federal court. I don't believe that partisans on either side would accept any such authentication or rejection from Kenyan officials given the corruption in Kenya.
In fact, Federal Judge Carter in CA said that even if Kenyan official did certify Lucas Smith's CPGH BC, he would likely rule in favor of a certified HI COLB, if submitted into evidence.
Only if Obama's original vital records are released and they show an amendment or evidence of a Kenya birth would any certification by Kenyan authorities overcome the "self-authentication" of Obama's HI COLB (assuming it is real).
This could well explain why Obama and the Obots are fighting so hard to discourage and mock birthers stonewall release of Obama's original HI vital records.
Look at how fast Charlie Rangel and Gov. Patterson were taken down once they lost their standing in the "court of public opinion" and became useless to the power elites. The same thing could happen to Obama overnight, and he knows it, I suspect.
If the GOP takes the House in November, they will have subpoena power to investigate Obama's original HI vital records.