Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: macquire

Dude, you are dense.The officer claims he smelled alcohol on her breath, but mere MINUTES late, not hours, but minutes late she blows a 0.00 on the breathalyzer. ZERO point ZERO ZERO. Forget the statements on BOTH sides.

She blew a 0.00. You can’t get around that no matter how hard you try.

OK, believe the cop. He didn’t pull her over for weaving or driving erratically. He claims he pulled her over for something that has nothing to do with alcohol.

He claims she had alcohol on her breath, but she blew a 0.00.

At a minimum, they have NO CASE against her for anything. I’ve been on FreeRepublic for 10 +years. I’ve never seen anyone argue such a losing cause.


274 posted on 07/03/2011 9:50:40 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: Bryan24

You are right. They don’t have a case against her. Nobody has said they do after she blew a 0.00. The situation is one of a trial attorney ambulance chaser bigshot dropping his name all over the place trying to get a good cop fired. Did you watch the video where the first thing he says to the cop is “Did you touch her”? THis ambulance chaswer is looking for 1) a lawsuit for $ and 2) publicity.


286 posted on 07/04/2011 4:26:12 AM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson