To: dangerdoc; citizen; Lancey Howard; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; ...
2 posted on
09/10/2011 8:55:57 AM PDT by
Kevmo
(Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: All; y'all; et al
PARTIAL CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS RELATING TO MITS HANDLING OF COLD FUSION
6 Infinite Energy ISSUE 24, 1999 MIT Special Report
March 23, 1989, afternoon
Fleischmann and Pons announcement at the University of Utah.
April 17, 1989
Richard Saltus of the Boston Globe writes to MIT President Paul Gray
complaining about lack of access to the MIT Plasma Fusion Center (see
Exhibit DMay 1 response by MIT President Gray (see Exhibit E).
April 26, 1989
MIT Professor Ronald Ballinger testifies before U.S. House of Representatives
Committee on Science, Space and Technology (see Exhibit A).
April 28, 1989
Professors Ronald R. Parker and Ronald Ballinger give interview to
Nick Tate of the Boston Herald, planting anti-cold fusion story (see Exhibit
B).
April 30, 1989
A late-night call by Professor Parker to Eugene Malloves home in Bow,
New Hampshire triggers press release to wire services denying the substance
of the Heralds banner page-one story the next day (see Exhibit C).
May 1, 1989
Press release from the MIT News Office issued, which denies Boston
Herald's characterization of Professor Parkers remarks about Pons and
Fleischmanns work as scientific schlock and maybe fraud. (See
Exhibit C.) MIT President Paul Gray sends letter to Boston Globe.
June 26, 1989
MIT Plasma Fusion Center holds Wake for Cold Fusion party weeks
before Phase-II calorimetry data are analyzed!
July 10, 1989
Section of PFC/JA-89-34 report exists which shows intermediate
processed Phase-II calorimetry data. Data are not yet time-averaged.
This was not published (see graphs, p. 11).
July 13, 1989
Section of PFC/JA-89-34 exists which shows intermediate processed
Phase II calorimetry data. Data for both H2O and D2O have been timeaveraged
in one-hour intervals. Power curve for D2O result retains
roughly the same shape as unaveraged data but has been shifted down.
This was published (see graphs, p. 11).
July, 1989
Publication of PFC/JA-89-34 cold fusion experiments report based on
work funded by DoE contract No. DE-AC0278ET51013. Mid-July initial
draft of DoE ERAB Cold Fusion Panel report is negative.
July 18, 1989
MIT PFC Director Parkers Memo on Cold Fusion Mug and stamp
out scientific schlock t-shirt (see Exhibit F).
November 1, 1989
Final DoE ERAB Cold Fusion Panel report is issued. It cites negative
MIT PFC reportAlbagli et al. as the first reference. (By contrast, positive
results from U.S. Naval Surface Weapons Center are omitted.)
March 26-28, 1990
Energy and Environment in the 21st Century conference at MIT. MIT
President Paul E. Gray makes unflattering comparison of cold vs. hot
fusion (see Exhibit G).
July 19, 1990
Chief Science Writer Dr. Eugene Mallove of the MIT News Office hears
for the first time parts of the Parker/Ballinger/Tate interview tape played
over telephone by Nick Tate of the Boston Herald (see Exhibit B).
August 15, 1990
Meeting with Dr. Stanley Luckhardt (MIT Plasma Fusion Center) and
independent scientist, electrochemist Dr. Vesco Noninski, in Dr. Luckhardt's
office. Within a week Dr. Noninski is challenging the analysis of
the MIT PFC calorimetry on analytical grounds.
September 8, 1990
Letter from PFC team member rejecting Noninskis analysis of the MIT
experimentletter provides minimal technical details.
October 10, 1990
Letter to Dr. Noninski from Chemistry Dept. head Professor Mark
Wrighton saying no evidence whatsoever has been obtained to verify
Pons and Fleischmann claims. Wrighton provides no technical details in
rebuttal (see Exhibit H).
January 16, 1991
Eugene Mallove meets with Prof. Ballinger in his office and Ballinger
remarks about Pons and Fleischmann being crooks who could have
been locked up in jail. At Gordon Institute lecture Ballinger makes
other negative remarks about Pons and Fleischmann (see Exhibit A).
January 19, 1991
Mallove discovers the July 1989 down-shifted MIT excess-heat curve
(See graphs, p. 11), which later became the subject of controversy.
January 25, 1991
Mallove has lunch at Networks in MIT Student Center with Dr. Luckhardt.
Luckhardt cant explain how bias was taken out. Luckhardt
said there could be 20 milliwatts excess power in the MIT PFC results,
but not the 80 mW that Fleischmann was talking about.
April 12, 1991
Letter from Eugene Mallove to MIT President Charles M. Vest, copy to
former President Paul E. Gray, suggesting organizing an MIT panel to reexamine
cold fusion in light of accumulating knowledge. No response
was ever received from either MIT President (see Exhibit I).
April 29, 1991
Eugene Mallove writes letter to Dr. Luckhardt requesting calorimetry
information (see Exhibit J).
May 13, 1991
Malloves first call to Dr. Luckhardt to try to get MIT PFC H2O curve.
May 20, 1991
Dr. Luckhardt cancels previously scheduled get-together with Mallove
and says he forgot to get raw data at his other office. He puts Mallove
off until the following Friday.
May 24, 1991
Two calls to Dr. Luckhardt (10 am and 1:30 pm)phone messages left
about getting data on H2O curve. No response to Malloves messages.
Near final version of Eugene Malloves resignation letter exists.
May 29, 1991
Taping of WGBH Boston Channel 2 clip on Cold FusionMallove and
MIT PFCs Dr. Richard Petrasso. Final refusal by Stan Luckhardt to
turn over PFC calorimetry data.
June 7, 1991
Professor Ronald Parker publicly disparages the PFC team's calorimetry
work on cold fusion! (See Exhibit K.) Eugene Mallove submits his
resignation from the MIT News Office (see Exhibit L) following the onehour
talk on cold fusion by Frank Close at the PFC and a heated question
and answer session (see Exhibit K).
June 14, 1991
Eugene Malloves request faxed to Professor Parker for promised data
relating to PFC cold fusion calorimetry experiments (see Exhibit M).
July 30, 1991
No response yet received from the PFC. Second request sent to Professor
Parker (see Exhibit N) Press release from MIT PFC stands by the
1989 PFC results and conclusions (see Exhibit T).
August 8, 1991
Fax letter from Parker to Mallove giving Stan Luckhardts revised objectives
of MIT PFC experiments and stonewalling again on data transfer
(see Exhibit O).
August 9, 1991
WBUR program about Malloves resignation and charges airs in Boston
(see Exhibit P).
August 13, 1991
Fax received by Mallove from Parker with heavy water and light water
curves (see Exhibit Q).
August 18, 1991
Formal request by Eugene Mallove to MIT President Vest for investigation
of scientific misconduct at MIT PFC, concerning both data mis-handling
and deception of press and MIT News Office (see Exhibit R).
September 16, 1991
Eugene Mallove responds to August 30, 1991 MIT PFC Press Release
(see Exhibit T).
October 9, 1991
President Vest writes to Prof. Philip Morrison requesting misconduct
inquiry opinion (see Exhibit U).
October 14, 1991
Prof. Morrisons initial inquiry report to President Vest (see Exhibit V).
October 17, 1991
President Vests response letter to Mallove (see Exhibit W).
October 24, 1991
Malloves letter to President Vest rejecting Morrisons assessment and
requesting a formal investigation (see Exhibit X).
November 11, 1991
Nobel Laureate Julian Schwinger speaks about cold fusion at MIT
physics gathering celebrating birthday of his former student. Evidently
this has no effect on Physics Dept. resistance (see pages 18-20).
December 31, 1991
Malloves letter to President Vest asking for status (see Exhibit Y).
January 2, 1992
Electrochemist Dr. Andrew Riley dies in cold fusion explosion at SRI
International. Dr. Brian Ahern (an MIT graduate) tried to warn SRI of
danger, but telephone call did not go through.
January 6, 1992
President Vest sends brush-off letter to Eugene Mallove (see Exhibit Z).
February 9, 1991
Eugene Mallove sends new evidence of scientific misconduct to President
Vest based on report of MIT graduate Dr. Mitchell Swartzs independent
investigation. Mallove demands thorough investigation (see Exhibit Z-1).
Further prompt to Vest on February 21 (see Exhibit Z-2).
March 10, 1992
Dr. Luckhardt sends memo to Prof. Morrison giving further explanations
of 1989 work. Redefines the objective of experiment as turn on
of anomalous heating event rather than D2O vs. H2O comparison!
(See Exhibit Z-3.)
March 19. 1992
NIH physicist Dr. Charles McCutchens letter to President Vest complaining
about ethical problems with MIT PFC experiment (see Exhibit
Z-4).
March 20, 1992
Prof. Morrisons second report to President Vest. Suggests Dr. Luckhardt
continue to have possession of data and should make further
assessments! (See Exhibit Z-5.)
April 1, 1992
President Vests final brush off letter to Eugene Mallove giving an unacceptable
conclusion. This was no April Fool joke (see Exhibit Z-6).
April 2, 1992
MIT Associate Provost Sheila Widnalls letter to Dr. McCutchena further
brush-off and statement that experimenters will continue to be processing
contested data and will be writing a future memo with experiment
clarifications. (See Exhibit Z-7.)
May 1992
Publication of MIT PFC Technical Report (PFC/RR-92-7), a singleauthor
(Luckhardt) Technical Appendix to D. Albagli et al. Journal of
Fusion Energy article (originally 16 authors!) Error limits of MIT PFC
calorimetry are further expanded and the nature of the experiment was
further redefined to deflect data mishandling accusation.
July 26, 1992
Dr. McCutchen letter to Provost Widnall, asks MIT PFC to publish a correction
that the experiment was not as advertised (see Exhibit Z-8).
August 3, 1992
Provost Widnalls letter to Dr. McCutchen giving final MIT brush-off
(see Exhibit Z-9).
August 18, 1992
Dr. McCutchen letter to Eugene Mallove details his frustration with
Provost Widnalls response (see Exhibit Z-10).
August 19, 1991
Dr. McCutchens final letter to Provost Widnall saying, I am sorry MIT
continues to tough it out. Apparently the university feels it need not be
fair to cold fusion people. (See Exhibit Z-11.)
August 1992
Dr. Mitchell R. Swartz publishes fourteen page analysis of MIT PFC Phase
II Calorimetry in Fusion Facts newsletter. Also published, in part, in subsequent
Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Cold Fusion and elsewhere.
3 posted on
09/10/2011 9:01:09 AM PDT by
Kevmo
(Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn't make any sense at all. ~Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson