I have no desire to silence skeptical discussion. I just don’t like seagulls. You can understand that, can’t you?
I’ve been a freeper for a long time. Probably longer than the admin who removed my post. We used to have some very rough & tumble discussions. Now we can’t even use fun and innocuous insults from blogthings.
Why should I even answer posts that so distort the facts on the ground that they amount to lies? You couldn’t discuss Rossi’s claims on their own merits if it meant putting money in your pocket.
How is pointing out the FACT that Rossi advertises a degree from a known diploma mill, which has been shut down, a “distort[ion of] the fact on the ground [so] that they amount to lies?”
Does Rossi claim the degree? YES. Is the degree bogus? YES. Was the so-called “university” shut down by the authorities? YES. This is black-and-white, unambiguous, objective fact.