[Lady Lucky]

If credible post-election polls were to show that no Catholic voter voted for Obozo and no Catholic voter voted for Mittler, then you may rest assured that the GOP, at least, would never nominate another evil candidate such as Mittler.

A point worth repeating to those so-called conservatives who urge us to be "practical" and vote for Romney. The right and practical thing to do is deny him votes. It would come at a high cost (Obama gets another 4 years) but the result for the GOP would be worth it. If another 4 years of Obama is what it takes to return the party to conservatism, so be it. Or if Obama can destroy this nation in 8 years, it was already rotten beyond saving.

In any case, people who surrender do not need to be defeated. Voting for a pro-abort, pro-gay who brought socialized medicine to his state -- that's not a compromise, that's a surrender to liberalism.

[John W]

“....but the result for the GOP would be worth it.”

How about the result for America?

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

[I]f Obama can destroy this nation in 8 years, it was already rotten beyond saving.

In any case, people who surrender do not need to be defeated.

I couldn't decide which truth deserved repeating more than its fellow... so I split the difference, and cheerfully went with both. ;)

[Kevmo]

If another 4 years of Obama is what it takes to return the party to conservatism, so be it. Or if Obama can destroy this nation in 8 years, it was already rotten beyond saving. In any case, people who surrender do not need to be defeated. Voting for a pro-abort, pro-gay who brought socialized medicine to his state — that’s not a compromise, that’s a surrender to liberalism.
***Excellent points. This whole overblown fear that Obama’s gonna destroy this nation is just a tactic to get conservatives to surrender. It is cowardice.