“How many years in prison did Bill Clinton, Jon Corzine & Charley Rangel get?”
Maybe you want to be Bill Clinton. I do not. I believe the truth is important. I’m more concerned with being on God’s side than on selling an argument, and that means taking the truth seriously.
“Would you and your wife assent to the terms of the updated contract”
The contract ALWAYS allowed the government to revise it at will. The contract never specified XXXX AMU forever. Since the government had the right to change it at will, it had less market value than a fixed contract on private land. It is possible to sue the BLM successfully for arbitrary and capricious changes to an allotment - Hage did, and won.
“The language from the court cases is just that - the language of the Double Tongues.”
The language was provided by Bundy in sworn statements. You cannot complain that, when required to give a statement under oath, he did not say what you wish he said.
“And speaking of court cases, did the BLM have some sort of court order enabling them to destroy Bundy’s water infrastructure out there in the desert...”
Bundy could sue for a ‘taking’, except he had no legal right to install those in the first place. A right to water does not mean you get to put a water tank anywhere you want. It means access to water, but not anywhere you choose to access the water. And water is something notably missing from any of Bundy’s court filings.
Maybe you want to be Bill Clinton. I do not. I believe the truth is important. I’m more concerned with being on God’s side than on selling an argument, and that means taking the truth seriously.
Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3147776/posts
Jon Corzine will probably press flesh at the fundraiser...
Yes, the "truth" is important all right. Our Lords in Washington LOVE it when the good little peasants have learned to tell the truth to their rightful lieges, and their hired guns.
I'm thinking the Founders would have given you an answer you wouldn't like.