You once again LIE about what I’ve posted. From this thread, and TO YOU:
Is Bundy’s Protest Tarnishing the Tea Party? (Weekly Standard jumping the shark?)
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 7:14:52 AM · 171 of 202
Mr Rogers to kiryandil
Actually, Bundy refused to sign the lease and pay the money because he said the federal government did not own the land. He wrote multiple letters to the BLM to that effect in 1993. For example, “Bundy responded by sending a Constructive Notice and Order to Stop, in which he again questioned the United States’ authority to manage the Allotment. See Exhibit 28 to #11.”
However, when I talk to people about this, I point out that a government that prevents Arizona law enforcement from helping arrest illegal immigrants, and that prosecutes the Maricopa sheriff for trying to slow illegal immigration, has no business using federal SWAT teams to go after trespassing cows! Who is trespassing more - a foreign citizen who comes to the US illegally, or a cow eating grass it hasn’t paid for? And why do alphabet agencies like the BLM need their own SWAT teams? Why not just put a lien against the cattle?
I also argue that a government which refuses to obey its own laws, such as repeatedly encouraging companies to violate Obama’s own healthcare law, has no business accusing ANYONE of disrespecting the rule of law!
We then can talk about the 20+ year policy of turning public lands into “no humans land”, and by the time we finish, most folks fully understand Bundy’s frustration and how angry people are.
Perhaps you can explain how that can be summarized as: “No problem with the Lords from Washington blowing a hundred grand or two on a joy-ride to Reno, eh, Mr Rogers? But HEY!!! “Bundy is a grazing fees deadbeat!!!” “Hage is a grazing fees deadbeat!!!””
You really are not honest at all...
In your [Mr Rogers] numerous discussions of the Wayne Hage case, you did The Progressive Thing - you left out stuff that you didn't want the other reader knowing.
Most people call it "lying by omission". It's one of the reasons I became a dedicated enemy of politicians in general, and Democrats in particular.
In post #200, Mr Rogers wrote:
I did not leave it out. I have mentioned it in numerous posts. For example: [Hage case posting]
Mr Rogers - you either have reading comprehension problems, or else the King's Shilling compels you to continue your baseless attacks, ala the Black Knight.
As we can clearly see from the exchange above, I wrote about your "numerous discussions of the Wayne Hage case".
I specifically said that you discussed the Wayne Hage case. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
You then accuse me of saying that you "left it out".
What I did was explain that you left out specific parts in your postings about the Hage case - the parts that show the government actors for the criminals that they are.
I then explained that this is the Progressive tactic of "lying by omission" - when they don't want their fanboys to know certain facts that make them look bad.
I think our readers here know who is the desperate liar (YOU).
Wipe the foam off your chin, you're making a spectacle of yourself.