To: rockrr; BroJoeK; cowboyway
Ummm,......it isn't very hard at all to find all the info you need about Napolitano and his self-admitted "contrarian" views about Lincoln. His "feelings" on the matter have been debunked by real historians. My advice, especially to CBW, would be to drop the matter and not sully a Civil War thread with the "judges" views on it. It is curious to me that CBW should put forth the views of a man who is thought to be, shall we say, light in the loafers. But perhaps that's what "cowboy way" means. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Meanwhile, CBW, I am hard at work on studying your question very carefully and working on my answer.
502 posted on
02/09/2016 5:58:39 PM PST by
HandyDandy
(Don't make up stuff. It just wastes everybody's time.)
To: HandyDandy
Pokie is stuck on stupid. She doesn't think things through and she doesn't heed advice. I think she likes looking foolish.
503 posted on
02/09/2016 6:21:02 PM PST by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: HandyDandy
His "feelings" on the matter have been debunked by real historians.
Post links to said "real historians".
My advice, especially to CBW, would be to drop the matter and not sully a Civil War thread with the "judges" views on it.
The thread went to crap when you False Cause losers showed up.
CBW should put forth the views of a man who is thought to be, shall we say, light in the loafers.
News to me but, if you say so. (I guess it takes one to know one.....)
I am hard at work on studying your question very carefully and working on my answer.
Don't strain yourself. I already know your answer.
504 posted on
02/09/2016 7:32:13 PM PST by
cowboyway
(We're not going to be able to vote our way out of this mess.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson