cowboyway:
"But yet you dismiss and deny the belligerent role of disHonest Abe. Pathetic." Just as I deny "the belligerent role" of President Roosevelt in the US entry into the Second World War.
In both cases, the decision to start war was made by enemies of the United States.
rockrr: "If you seek the sort of imbecility that pokie laps up you need look no further than deloranzo."
Turns out, Amazon has no books by a deloranzo, but there are several deLorenzo writers -- Jacqui, Richard, Peter and Yusuf, none of whom, it seems, wrote about the Lost Cause.
However, when I just now searched on the topic of "Lost Cause myths", a good many books come up, including these:
So I think I'll start with the most recent (#1 above) and work backwards (down the list).
Sorry, I meant thomas dilorenzo, the gold standard for slipshod lost cause urnalism. He’s the Art Bell of Civil War revisionism and a patron saint of losers like pokie.
His crap is so smelly that the moderators routinely remove threads if they come from him or his master, lewrockwell.
Just as I deny "the belligerent role" of President Roosevelt in the US entry into the Second World War. In both cases, the decision to start war was made by enemies of the United States.To even attempt to compare Pearl Harbor to Fort Sumter is ludicrous on its face and removes any subatomic smidgen of credibility that you may have had.
Since it's obvious that you are an advocate of historical revisionism one has to assume that you'll be happy in your final resting place knowing that 150 years from now your progeny will be taught about the greatness and saint like qualities of 0bama.