Roy Moore claimed he didn’t know her, and it is clear that he did. He’s being called out for it, and yes, he needs to explain himself. You don’t have to be a “district attorney” or legal scholar of any sort to be able to state the obvious.
Why exactly should the person pointing this out be mocked for it? How does your post make a bit of sense?
do you have any idea how many yearbooks I signed? We were just getting everyone to sign our yearbooks even if you didn’t know them.
No it is not clear that he did know her, and he has denied knowing her or eating at that restaurant. Have you looked at the yearbook note? Have you noticed that everything after the name “Roy” (and it could be Ray) is signed in different color ink and the handwriting doesn’t match up with the first part of the note? Looks to me like the whole thing is a forgery and the identifying part was added after the fact. The good thing is that there are ways to prove whether Roy Moore signed the book or just someone named Ray had signed it and then someone forged some additional verbiage to look like Moore signed it. It was a small town. If he ate there a lot word would have leaked out from someone who saw him there.
Two different colors of ink. Forgery.
How is it clear that he did? What information have you seen that I haven't?
Do you think that is possible, or do you remember everyone you ever met 40 years ago.