Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has ANYONE ever been imprisoned for smoking pot?
09/21/02 | Libloather

Posted on 09/21/2002 5:49:50 PM PDT by Libloather

Liberteens come, and Liberteens go. But they seem to have an awful time with their own (and biggest - maybe only) issue - pot.

As far as anyone can tell, not ONE person has been placed behind bars for smoking pot. But the Liberteens paint an entirely different picture. They claim that HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS are behind bars for smoking.

Can anyone provide any proof either way?


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-478 next last
To: takenoprisoner
Thanks for that. I'm sure LibertyLoather will find some petty flaw with it, which is ok with me. He is just showing himself to be an anal-retentive Clintonite weasel-worder.
441 posted on 10/02/2002 8:33:43 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
Libloather has in the end been trapped in his own web of deceit. So trapped, sooner or later even libloather will tire of the battle to escape his demise. Another drug warrior bites the dust.
442 posted on 10/02/2002 8:47:00 PM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

443 posted on 10/03/2002 6:25:05 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donh

the law against being stoned is called PI or DUI if you are operatong a vhicle. States have passed amendments that include any intoxicants, which include pot.


444 posted on 07/02/2005 2:01:32 PM PDT by outlaw1_2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I had a friend who spent 18 months in jail in South Carolina for smoking pot.


445 posted on 07/02/2005 2:03:13 PM PDT by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outlaw1_2003
the law against being stoned is called PI or DUI if you are operatong a vhicle. States have passed amendments that include any intoxicants, which include pot.

There's a law against driving while asleep, that does not automatically make sleeping a crime. There is no law against being stoned, because that's too close to thought crimes for our legislatures to stomach while we are still pretending to have a Constitutionally limited republic, affirms sacrosanct individual rights, rather than a communist nanny state.

446 posted on 07/02/2005 4:00:27 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
By "Liberteen" do you mean Libertine or Libertarian?

Spell check is your friend

447 posted on 07/02/2005 4:03:25 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
As a lawyer, I can tell you that anyone smoking marijuana is, by legal definition, "possessing" it.

Not that I'm enchanted with defending our country's communistically inspired drug laws, but...

While there are some countries that will prosecute you solely for failing a drug test, I have never heard of anyone being arrested in the US simply for being high. You must be put with the goods in some manner here.

448 posted on 07/02/2005 4:12:31 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Poser; takenoprisoner
I had a friend who spent 18 months in jail in South Carolina for smoking pot.

Here we go again? What was your friend convicted of? Please, be specific...

449 posted on 07/02/2005 4:31:12 PM PDT by Libloather (I trust Hillary as far as I can throw her...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
By "Liberteen" do you mean Libertine or Libertarian?

I meant Liberteen. Thanks for noticing...

450 posted on 07/02/2005 4:32:36 PM PDT by Libloather (I trust Hillary as far as I can throw her...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

He didn't sell it, so it had to be smoking it.

Your exercise in symantics is stupid.


451 posted on 07/02/2005 5:06:55 PM PDT by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: Poser
He didn't sell it, so it had to be smoking it.

So you don't know the specifics. Why post anything, let alone a false claim?

Your exercise in symantics is stupid.

Too many Liberteen idiots claim that MILLIONS (maybe BILLIONS) of other idiots are imprisoned for smoking pot - when, in fact, NONE are - because smoking pot isn't a crime. Thanks for your contribution...

452 posted on 07/02/2005 5:18:38 PM PDT by Libloather (I trust Hillary as far as I can throw her...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
To smoke pot, you must posses pot. There is no difference between the two from a legal point of view.

Arguing over semantics makes you look pretty silly.
453 posted on 07/02/2005 6:46:36 PM PDT by Poser (Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 452 | View Replies]

To: Poser
To smoke pot, you must posses pot.

To smoke pot, you must 'posses' a match. No one person - before you, or after you - has EVER gone to prison for that.

How much pot did your perp friend 'posses' while the cuffs went on? (My wild guess - 18 months worth...)

454 posted on 07/02/2005 6:56:23 PM PDT by Libloather (I trust Hillary as far as I can throw her...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: outlaw1_2003
the law against being stoned is called PI or DUI if you are operatong a vhicle. States have passed amendments that include any intoxicants, which include pot.

...and by the way, extending DUI to marijuana is unscientific malarky. The NTSB, and the Calif. Hwy Patrol both ran extensive controlled experiments on stoned drivers to try to metricize the blood stream level that could be deemed DUI. No such levels were found. No matter how stoned the stoned drivers got, they still outperformed their control counterparts on a large percentage of the tests. Turns out that while marijuana produces a slight temporary reduction of short-term memory, it compensates by making users more attentive to the moment, and memory isn't as useful to drivers as attentiveness.

If you'd like to test this report, try asking a cop what the exact level of cannabanoids in the blood stream is that consititues DUI--the answer will be: ANY. Pretty remarkable, eh, given that they did extensive testing to establish exactly that. Just another example of what brazen, out-and-out thugs the drug warriors are.

455 posted on 07/02/2005 7:38:13 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
To smoke pot, you must 'posses' a match. No one person - before you, or after you - has EVER gone to prison for that.

Except for, I'll guesstimate, a couple of hundred arsonists.

456 posted on 07/02/2005 7:45:25 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: donh
There's a law against driving while asleep, that does not automatically make sleeping a crime. There is no law against being stoned...

In certain circumstances, yes, it is against the law. Care to tell us what circumstances they might be?

457 posted on 07/02/2005 8:12:26 PM PDT by Libloather (I trust Hillary as far as I can throw her...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

You've got someone who loves you,
you've got someone who cares,
you've got someone who will fix you up
if ever you need repairs!

You've got someone who'll take the time,
to listen to your prayers,
I've got, you've got, everybody do got,
someone who cares, by the name of...


458 posted on 07/02/2005 8:14:20 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
In certain circumstances, yes, it is against the law. Care to tell us what circumstances they might be?

In certain circumstances, it is a crime to carry a gun, but that does not make carrying a gun, per se, illegal. We already talked about being asleep. Being stoned, per se, is not a crime in this country. "Certain circumstances" and "per se", do not delineate overlapping events, even if you hold your breath until you turn blue.

459 posted on 07/02/2005 8:19:10 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: donh; Poser
Being stoned, per se, is not a crime in this country.

Poser, you gettin' any of this? And your perp friend went to prison for what - again?

460 posted on 07/02/2005 8:22:58 PM PDT by Libloather (I trust Hillary as far as I can throw her...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461-478 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson