Posted on 11/21/2002 12:16:16 AM PST by Marine Inspector
PALEOCONSERVATIVES often refer to "the limits of permissible dissent" in describing the struggle to hold on to their views in the realms of the media and academia against the censure of both the left and the "mainstream" right. Now, this struggle has been extended into the realm of the internet, the supposed last frontier of unregulated speech and capitalism. Indeed, we may be witnesses, as Frederick Jackson Turner would say, to the closing of this frontier, not just because of the collapse of the dot-com economy but because of the new limits imposed on speech and content, which will only become more pronounced as the War on Terrorism progresses.
In 1996, Fresno, California, resident and internet surfer Jim Robinson had a problem: His posts on Prodigy message hoards and chat rooms, particularly his strong criticisms of President Bill Clinton, were being censored by Prodigy's administrators. So he started his own web site—Free Republic (www.freerepublic.com).
Free Republic was more than just an ordinary message board in the early settlement of the internet. Surfers could post whole articles from publications and make them topics of discussion and debate. And it was more than just another chat room. Free Republic’s likeminded members could be connected from across the country to organize activist projects and events. ln 1998, when many Republicans wanted to ignore Kenneth Starr’s report on the Clinton scandals rather than deal with its charges, Free Republic members (or "Freepers," as they call themselves) lit up the congressional phones and organized demonstrations that influenced Republicans in the House to vote for articles of impeachment. And it was the Freepers, not the GOP, who organized the demonstrations of conservatives down in Florida during the 2000 presidential vote recount.
Over 60,000 people have been registered members of Free Republic, the largest conservative-oriented website in the world. Members are a diverse lot: independents, Republicans, libertarians, (large "L" and small), neocons, paleocons, Buchanan Brigaders, Keyes supporters and everything in between. Even such prominent pundits as Justin Raimondo, Ann Coulter, Barbara Olson, and Lucianne Goldberg (known by her Freeper handle, "Trixie") have made frequent posts.
As in any frontier boomtown, however, with rapid growth came predictable problems. Some of the articles posted on the site came from racist or antisemitic web sites. Conspiracy theorists also made use of Free Republic. Leftists began to infiltrate the site, posting articles or posing as conservatives to act as agents provocateurs. "Vanity posts" became more frequent, and flame wars among members became more intense, as the site split into factions during the 2000 presidential election. Overall, civility degenerated. Some members became concerned that Free Republic had become a virtual hangout for kooks. Matters came to a head in early 2000 when Robinson (or "JimRob") speculated on George W. Bush’s connection to the airport in Mena, Arkansas where drug and gun-running allegedly took place during the 1980’s. Matt Drudge then dropped Free Republic’s link from the Drudge Report, and Goldberg took 2.000 members with her to start her own Lucianne.com.
Robinson decided to clean up his website and, like any good sheriff, deputized a posse of site moderators to remove offensive posts, threads, and articles and to ban those who posted them. But they did not stop there. Soon, they had banned the posting of any articles from certain websites that they deemed taboo, such as VDare.com ("too divisive"), LewRockwell.com, DixieNet.org (the League of the South’s website) , and the Free State Project’s website (www.FreeStateProject.org)
It would be easy to conclude that Robinson and his monitors simply went overboard in an effort to clean up the excesses of Free Republic, but there is more to it than that.
Because of its significant growth, Free Republic costs $240,000 annually to maintain. As a non-profit, Free Republic depends on donors, large and small, for its survival. No doubt the embarrassment of being dropped from the Drudge Report and Goldberg’s public break with the site concerned Robinson, and lie feared that funds might dry up if his site were perceived to he on the fringe. In addition, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times sued Free Republic for copyright infringement. The case was settled out of court. It was only natural for Robinson and his site administrators to want to look good for prospective donors.
With so many posters banned, the diversitv of thought on Free Republic has been reduced to the musings of neoconservatives, Zionists, Republicans who act is if Free Republic were an annex of GOP headquarters, those who consider George W. Bush a demigod and offer daily prayers to him, and other sycophants and cheerleaders, Robinson has made it clear where he stands: "I see that the only Party capable of blocking arid defeating the evil Democrats is the Republican Party. I see that many races are so close hat as little as a one percent siphon of conservative votes to a third party could be the difference between success and failure. I see allowing a Democrat to remain in power when it could have been prevented as a triumph of evil."
Many banned Freepers have turned to such sites as Liberty Post (www.libertypost.org) and Liberty Forum (www.libertyforum.org) where members can post articles from anywhere and comment without interference from the thought police or fear of Siberian banishment. But Free Republic will still remain the 800-pound gorilla of conservative websites for some time, just as National Review has been for conservative magazines, despite being watered down. Frontiers, whether on land or in cyberspace, cannot survive when developers start plotting out the fencerows.
—Sean Scallon
I've been here as long as anyone.
Seems to me it's pretty consistent.
You might want to amend that statement. I post there and here. Am I an anti-Freeper then, too?
Customs whistleblower sues treasury secretary
This agent shared info with the DEA that led to a huge cocaine smuggling bust and was prevented from reporting an illegal alien that she caught with $30,000, taped to his belly, to security for the airline he worked for. It was the second time this illegal alien had been caught doing the same thing!
She hasn't worked since. Would you 'blow the whistle'?
Ah! YESSS!!!
Those were the days, with the likes of posters like Missy Kelly, Karen Bixman (of UN National Park grabbing fame), Sydonia Dove, and even British journalists like Ambrose Evans-Pritchard.
Alas, all good things come to an end, eventually...my ersatz access via a 286 clone running DOS on Prodigy among them. The EGA Monitor gave up the Ghost the VERY DAY Drudge did the Siren thing with an obscure intern named Monica.
Still, 40 Reams of printouts (I didn't have access to Mass Storage then) fully documented OKC (American Reichstag), WACO, FBI files, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.
And, now we have Little Tommy Daschle complaining that, in essence, the mean Prodigy cum Freepers are beginning to learn how to play Football...
Most magazines do not web publish their articles until a month after the print edition is mailed out. And many do not put all their articles on their website even then. After all, why would the subscribers buy the cow if the milk is free?
So my guess is that if they put it on the web site at all, it won't be until January.
For those unaware of Chronicles, you might edify yourself by subscribing, as it's one of the finest cultural and political magazines around. Moreover, if you knew the magazine then you'd also know that the Scallon article was not a "Letter to the Editor"--each month Chronicles runs a few short bits after its correspondence section on a variety of topics.
The personal attacks on Marine Inspector based on his purported agenda, his past crimes and misdemeanors, etc. are also a hallmark of the Left. Now, I don't know MI from a hole in the wall, and I don't care. But even if he was a screaming idiot, that has precious little to do with the merits of the Chronicles post.
Finally, the criticisms of FreeRepublic in the Chronicles piece are muted at best. Why does even the slightest criticism of JimRob or FreeRepublic result in such dramatic and heated flaming? Thin-skinned overreactions are what THEY do best--the Hillarys, the Jesses, the NOWs. It's a mystery when one sees us doing it amongst ourselves.
Sorry, you don't get off that easily. The "blatant lie" could not be produced, so now you change it around to being ambiguous and implied. You're wrong. It's ok. You can admit it. It won't hurt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.