To: babygene
There is nothing Christian about being taken advantage of. There is something Christian about taking into consideration the well-being of an innocent child who never asked to be born in the first place. If the duped man can get his money back from his philandering wife, good. The accompanying problem, though, is this: What will happen emotionally to the child who was formerly loved by his father, but suddenly appears no longer to be loved? He learns that love is something to be turned off at will. It's an emotional scar he/she carries for life. It is Christian to take this into consideration. It is Christian for the duped father to do something to see that the child is damaged as little as possible.
To: Clara Lou
" It is Christian for the duped father to do something to see that the child is damaged as little as possible."
Bull
Sh@t. This man has no more responsibility for ensuring that "this" child doesn't suffer, than he does for the other billions (thats billions with a B) of unfortunate children that are damaged who are not his.
He has no more moral responsible to this child than your husband does (if you are married).
90 posted on
11/29/2002 10:25:55 AM PST by
babygene
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson