To: Balto_Boy
The court opinion is a little meatier than this would lead you to believe. It would behoove folks to read the decision before forming an opinion. Not to say I in any way applaud this ruling; I consider it an abomination. But the court had its reasons for ruling as it did, and the opinion spells them out pretty clearly.
9 posted on
11/29/2002 7:43:12 AM PST by
IronJack
To: IronJack
Wife lied to him.
Kid not his.
Fraud.
Case closed.
To: IronJack
But the court had its reasons for ruling as it did, and the opinion spells them out pretty clearly.
Yes the court had its reasons, none of which are based on the law. Social agendas are un-constitutional.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson