Both of which have absolutely no bearing on an individual's ability to attend gym class . . .
Remember what I said at my very first post - the reason why men and women are segregated into different changing rooms has to do with it not turning into a peep show. A student being Jewish does not do this, unless you're some wacko anti-Semite.
So then wouldn't a more perfect world assign locker rooms based upon sexual preference vice actual sexual equipment?
Quite touching that you defend the rules when you like them. I seem to recall that your grasp on drug laws in the United States was lex mala, lex nulla.
I'm working to overturn the laws criminalizing personal marijuana possession, yes.
However, you can only say that the school "probably" or "possibly" broke the law, not that they did.
A journalistic convention because this case hasn't been settled. Not unlike writing "alleged" or "allegedly" before everything.
Secondly, you seem to not want to accept the societal norm about why changing rooms are segregated by sex.
As I alluded to earlier, if this were truly the case, and society was really interested in preventing "peep shows" as you claim it is, changing rooms would be segregated by sexual preference, not by sex. There'd be a homo room and a hetero room. As a hetero man I'd have to change with other hetero men, but I wouldn't have to change with homosexual men. But whose loins is society trying to cool here? Could a lesbian woman change among heterosexual men? How about a straight woman among homosexual men? A straight guy among lesbian women? Or how about bisexuals---can they pick and choose depending on the day of the week? The permutations are endless.
No, it's not very conservative to steamroll over parents in favour of a special interest group, which you are so strenously defending.
No parents other than the lesbian girl's mother were consulted in this case. Why do you continue to exist they were---that they rose up and demanded their daughters be allowed to change for gym class in a lesbian-free environment?
Sophistry. Since the Victorian Era at least, this was precisely the division - it was considered unseemly to have the two sexes changing in front of each other for peep show reasons. The reason why homosexuals did not get their "own" rooms was because until very late in the 20th century, while homosexuality existed, it was not something that was out in the open, thus no provision was made when this societal norm was created.
No parents other than the lesbian girl's mother were consulted in this case. Why do you continue to exist they were---that they rose up and demanded their daughters be allowed to change for gym class in a lesbian-free environment?
You're missing the point. You are basically saying that the other girls and their parents have no say in this. I am saying they do.
Ivan