Acceptance of a literal interpretation of Genesis is not a prerequisite for salvation.
Starting that nonsense again? We already now that you in particular and most of your friends are atheists. Your statement is an absolute lie specifically designed to lead people out of their religion.
Jr.,
Interesting that now alone do you care as to the salvatory requirements. The exclusionary nature of your response speaks for itself. The man above states that all truth will be revealed post humously (who would/could argue that?) Ok, Ok, the inference was that you were hellbound, but was it not John (JC's best friend) who blatanly stated "in the beginning was the word...and the word became flesh and dwelt among us."? So JC's pre-existence should be acknowledged. Um, for clarification purposes, are you saying you are Christian (ie: one who believes in the sacrificial, penal, atonement of Christ on the cross, and his subsequent resurrection?)???(y/n please)
1 more Q.: When God made man, he is said to have created him from mud---When Jesus healed the (one of many) blind man, he spit into dirt (made mud) and spread it on the man's eyes (definitely a "creative" act.) Was this not a statement of his earlier pre-existence?