To: Agitate
The right to adopt. This is the part that gets to me.
If a guy whats to screw up his life, OK, but why bring kids into his weird life?
These children have no say in what family they're brought into, and unlike the homosexuals who adopt them, the children are "not consenting adults".
In effect, children adopted by homosexuals are little more than "pets" that only serve the pleasure of the homosexual parents. When these homosexual "parents" divorce, as they generally do, who takes care of the children while the now divorced "parents" are scouting out new partners?
7 posted on
12/01/2004 1:59:46 PM PST by
Noachian
(A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
To: Noachian
You wrote some very good points, which I agree with. 87% of gays were abused as children, by an adult of the same sex. The other 13% admitted to have been "introduced to this lifestyle at a very young age" They didn't consider it abuse, or molestation.
My question is, we know the abused tend to abuse. (not all, but the percentages are staggering) So why are we allowing these kids to have contact with these people? The Boy Scouts don't for that very reason!
I'm sorry they were abused, but it has to stop, the answer isn't to create a whole new generation of gays! That's what they are doing, by adopting kids, and indoctrinating in schools.
23 posted on
12/01/2004 9:21:08 PM PST by
gidget7
(God Bless America, and our President George W. Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson