Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds proble Saudi "peace plan" pushed by Friedman
The American Thinker ^ | 12 17 04 | Ed Lasky

Posted on 12/18/2004 1:11:11 PM PST by rightalien

The de facto Arab Foreign Minister, New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, who has long courted the Arab world and counts among his hosts Arab dictators across the region, now may be tinged by an unfolding scandal involving Saudi Arabia.

Over two years ago, Tom Friedman introduced to American audiences a Saudi peace plan which consisted of Israel basically relinquishing control of lands captured in the defensive 1967 War, in return for vague promises of diplomatic recognition by the Arab world. This "peace plan" was created by Saudi Arabia to deflect attention from its role over the years of fomenting hate around the Muslim world, for supporting terrorism around the Western world, and for the complicity of its citizens in the 9/11 attacks on America.

The New York Times endlessly trumpeted the "virtues" of this plan, and Tom Friedman took great pride in being the one to present it to America. Now the Justice Department has begun an investigation of the possibility that this very campaign violated federal laws regarding foreign agents operating in America. The crux of the matter is that the Saudis' public relations firm Qorvis failed to disclose that it was being paid by a foreign government to spread its propaganda and failed to register as a foreign agent....

The New York Times does not need to be paid for pushing the interests of Arab dictators - they do it for free. Nevertheless, the blowback from his investigation hopefully will tarnish the suspect virtues of the Gray Lady.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: nyt; saudiarabia; tomfriedman
Well, good old NYT, good old Tom Friedman
1 posted on 12/18/2004 1:11:12 PM PST by rightalien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightalien
It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of people.
2 posted on 12/18/2004 1:15:04 PM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightalien
Enron was paying Krugman, perhaps the Saudis were paying Friedman?
3 posted on 12/18/2004 1:21:32 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightalien

I heard Michael Isikoff talking about this earlier on Fox, but I just caught the tail end. It sounds like a clear violation of federal law occurred, but I don't recall hearing about the Friedman connection (though it would not surprise me).


4 posted on 12/18/2004 1:26:09 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max Combined

Where's Micheal Moore when you need him?


5 posted on 12/18/2004 1:28:02 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson