Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush is Pro-Life in Name Only
CHRISTIAN PATRIOTS FOR LIFE ^ | 1-16-05 | Kevin Jeanfreau

Posted on 01/16/2005 1:54:25 PM PST by cpforlife.org

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last
To: Mr. Silverback

Headscarf and other headdress ban in all government schools and offices and drivers license photos would make a lot of sense and go a long way towards liberating the iron fisted control that the crazed mullahs have over muslim women. This is not a minor issue IMO.


201 posted on 01/18/2005 11:38:29 PM PST by tkathy (Ban all religious head garb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Southack
"This means that *anyone*, especially people like you, who favors bringing Roe v Wade challenges now, before we've changed the personnel on the Supreme Court, is actually someone who is pursuing a path that will HARM ALL PRO-LIFE EFFORTS."

Well stated and agreed.

202 posted on 01/19/2005 10:24:04 AM PST by TAdams8591 (It ceases to be OUR charity when the GOVERNMENT gives it away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
There are some threads I find interesting and return to do a more thorough review. This thread was one of them. "Anti-choicers want all these babies born, but they don’t want to adopt them, help the mothers, do social work or pay higher taxes."

This argument was used ad nauseum even when I was in college in the late 70's early 80's. Our college group, and as well the local community pro-life organization at the time, did all we could to dispel that lie.

Your list is excellent. Please add me to your ping list.

203 posted on 01/19/2005 10:31:17 AM PST by TAdams8591 (It ceases to be OUR charity when the GOVERNMENT gives it away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Headscarf and other headdress ban in all government schools and offices and drivers license photos would make a lot of sense and go a long way towards liberating the iron fisted control that the crazed mullahs have over muslim women. This is not a minor issue IMO.

You idea of liberation is Orwellian.

Many women and MEN want to wear their religion headdress and you are acting like a true Communist by wanting to ban it. I am no fan of the Islamic religion but people have the right to choose to express their religion. I can redirect you to Michael Newdow and his religion hating friend if you like?

204 posted on 01/19/2005 12:01:55 PM PST by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: tkathy

You=Your


205 posted on 01/19/2005 12:02:34 PM PST by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: M 91 u2 K

I know countless very religious people including ministers, and NONE of them wear head wrappings. These head getups are not religous, they are political symbols of power and control. I am sure the Almighty could care less about such nonsense.


206 posted on 01/19/2005 12:13:09 PM PST by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
I know countless very religious people including ministers, and NONE of them wear head wrappings.

Ever saw the Pope? Ever met an Orthodox Jew?

ARe they religious nuts and oppressing women?

207 posted on 01/19/2005 12:21:39 PM PST by M 91 u2 K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

Both Bush's wife and mother are pro choice, they probably realize that criminalizing the whole thing would never work.


208 posted on 01/19/2005 12:21:49 PM PST by tkathy (Tyranny breeds terrorism. Freedom breeds peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
"Both Bush's wife and mother are pro choice"

Interesting. Seems the President has not been too successful in 'changing hearts and minds'. However, he has been quite successful to persuade whenever he really wants something. Have pro-lifers been bamboozled, stay tuned.

209 posted on 01/19/2005 1:15:20 PM PST by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
"And FWIW--I posted a list similar to Mr. Silverback's from another source and other articles praising the Bush administration on Pro-Life on more than one ocassion, so I am in no way against the man, I just want to challenge him to do more."

There's nothing wrong with the above, cp. The title of this article, however, takes it too far, and I do think mischaracterizes the Presidents position.

210 posted on 01/19/2005 7:45:39 PM PST by TOUGH STOUGH (I support Terri's supporters!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Yeah I saw that post. I printed to look over it in more depth. Have you read it? It looks impressive until one begins to get a felling of deja vu all over again. Most items are listed 2, 3 even 4 times. The same thing under a different heading. And others are just plain laughable regardless which side you sit on. I mean really "floated the possibility of nominating" so and so.

There are a few good things but it reads like a scare tactic by Planned Parenthood designed to drum up donations. Like the Anti-defemation league did when "The Passion of Christ" came out last year. "Oh no the Bogey man is gonna get cha" The items that have any teeth are lost in the undergrowth.

The sad thing is I was glad to see the list and printed it out hoping it would make me feel better about the GOP. It didn't do a whole lot. And I see on my pings another headline that takes that little bit away. I fear they have been lying to us for 35 years.
211 posted on 01/20/2005 12:31:29 PM PST by Mark in the Old South (Note to GOP "Deliver or perish" Re: Specter I guess the GOP "chooses" to perish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Mark in the Old South

***Yeah I saw that post. I printed to look over it in more depth. It looks impressive until one begins to get a felling of deja vu all over again. ***

***There are a few good things but it reads like a scare tactic by Planned Parenthood designed to drum up donations.***

Hmmmm...my point was not the number of items, but the content. A few good things? Huh?

A pro-lifer in charge of the nation's health.

No US tax dollars for foreign abortions, or the promotion of abortion.

None of your tax dollars pay for federal employees' birth control.

A promoter of abstinence becomes the chief advisor on AIDS.

Taking a teen to get an out of state abortion is now a federal crime.

Thompson fights the condom approach to AIDS prevention.

Partial Birth Abortion Ban.

Pro-lifer at refugee post.

UNFPA gets no US money for three years.

Embryo adoption promoted.

CEDAW is rejected.

Another pro-life/pro-abstinence AIDS advisor.

Hospitals will not be forced to give abortions.

WHO pro-abortion program gets no US tax dollars.

Pro-condom myths and pro-abortion breast cancer lies go off
the HHS website.

Embryo is considered a human by US government scientitsts.

Title X overseen by abstinence-promoter.

US ditches support for pro-abortion treaty.

Multiple pro-lifers (and specifically, anti-RU486) appointed to FDA.

No more abortions at our military facilities.

Cairo pro-abortion language is not endorsed by US.

And that's just in the Family Planning section.

Certainly, only a pro-abort would allow such things on his watch, right? Get a grip.


212 posted on 01/22/2005 3:34:22 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Women need abortion like a fish needs a bicycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

Prayer *is* "works".


213 posted on 01/22/2005 5:05:19 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Both President Bush and Governor Bush could save Terri. In fact they are bound by their oaths to do so. But they obviously will not. Also


   NEWS RELEASE: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:                February 08, 2005

Bush Signs Title X Funding Increase for 2005

Planned Parenthood's Abortion Funding Increased


President George W. Bush and the Republican-majority Congress
Increased Title X to record $288.3 million in FY 2005 on 12/8/04


Title X is one of two major federal government funding sources for Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the nation's largest chain of abortion centers (murdering over 244,000 unborn human beings per year by surgical abortion alone).


Title X appropriation for FY 2005 (Oct. 2004 to Sept. 2005) was signed into law as part of H.R. 4818 (see bill at http://thomas.loc.gov), the mammoth appropriations bill which contained the huge outlays for the (unconstitutional) Department of Health and Human Services.


Republican-majority U.S. House approved H.R. 4818 by a vote of 344 to 51, on November 20, 2004 (Roll Call Number: 542). [Republicans 183 Yea, 27 Nay; Democrats 160 Yea, 24 Nay; 1 Independent Yea]


Republican-majority U.S. Senate approved H.R. 4818 by a vote of 65 to 30, on November 20, 2004 (Record Vote Number: 215) [Republicans 42 Yea, 6 Nay; Democrats 23 Yea, 23 Nay; 1 Independent Nay]


Republican President signed H.R. 4818 into law, authorizing the highest ever spending level for Title X in the history of the program, on December 8, 2004. It became Public Law No. 108-447.

This FY 2005 Bush administration Title X funding level of $288 million (an estimated $50-$60 million of which will be paid to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, for population control), exceeds by over $30 million, the highest Title X level during the Clinton administration, in FY 2001, of $254 million!

______________________________________________

Note:

    The Title X program includes funding for contraceptive birth control; birth control that causes chemical abortions; and birth control for unmarried adolescents, even if their parents object to the federal government giving their children hormonal drugs and devices with which to fornicate.

    The Title X program is also one of the principal federal government funding mechanisms for Planned Parenthood Federation of America (founded by Margaret Sanger), the nation's largest chain of child-murder-by-abortion centers.

Information on Title X: http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/titlex/ofp.html

Title X funding history since inception in 1971:
From the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Population Affairs website: http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/titlex/ofp-funding-history.html

______________________________________________

Pertinent text below, documenting appropriation of $288,283,000 for Title X is shown below, from:

H.R.4818 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate) - Federal HHS Appropriations Bill (FY 2005)

______________________________________________

H.R.4818


Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)

______________________________________________


TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES


    For carrying out titles II, III, IV, VII, VIII, X, XII, XIX, and XXVI of the Public Health Service Act, section 427(a) of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act, title V and sections 1128E, 711, and 1820 of the Social Security Act, the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, as amended, the Native Hawaiian Health Care Act of 1988, as amended, the Cardiac Arrest Survival Act of 2000, section 712 of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and the Poison Control Center Enhancement and Awareness Act, as amended, $6,856,624,000, of which $484,629,000 shall be available for construction and renovation (including equipment) of health care and other facilities and other health-related activities as specified in the statement of the managers on the conference report accompanying this Act, and of which $39,499,000 from general revenues, notwithstanding section 1820(j) of the Social Security Act, shall be available for carrying out the Medicare rural hospital flexibility grants program under section 1820 of such Act: Provided, That of the funds made available under this heading, $249,000 shall be available until expended for facilities renovations at the Gillis W. Long Hansen's Disease Center: Provided further, That in addition to fees authorized by section 427(b) of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986, fees shall be collected for the full disclosure of information under the Act sufficient to recover the full costs of operating the National Practitioner Data Bank, and shall remain available until expended to carry out that Act: Provided further, That fees collected for the full disclosure of information under the `Health Care Fraud and Abuse Data Collection Program', authorized by section 1128E(d)(2) of the Social Security Act, shall be sufficient to recover the full costs of operating the program, and shall remain available until expended to carry out that Act: Provided further, That $31,000,000 of the funding provided for community health centers shall be used for base grant adjustments for existing centers: Provided further, That no more than $100,000 is available until expended for carrying out the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 233(o) including associated administrative expenses: Provided further, That no more than $45,000,000 is available until expended for carrying out the provisions of Public Law 104-73: Provided further, That $9,941,000 is available until expended for the National Cord Blood Stem Cell Bank Program as described in House Report 108-401: Provided further, That of the funds made available under this heading, $288,283,000 shall be for the program under title X of the Public Health Service Act to provide for voluntary family planning projects: Provided further, That amounts provided to said projects under such title shall not be expended for abortions, that all pregnancy counseling shall be nondirective, and that such amounts shall not be expended for any activity (including the publication or distribution of literature) that in any way tends to promote public support or opposition to any legislative proposal or candidate for public office: Provided further, That $793,872,000 shall be for State AIDS Drug Assistance Programs authorized by section 2616 of the Public Health Service Act: Provided further, That in addition to amounts provided herein, $25,000,000 shall be available from amounts available under section 241 of the Public Health Service Act to carry out Parts A, B, C, and D of title XXVI of the Public Health Service Act to fund section 2691 Special Projects of National Significance: Provided further, That, notwithstanding section 502(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, not to exceed $119,158,000 is available for carrying out special projects of regional and national significance pursuant to section 501(a)(2) of such Act: Provided further, That of the funds provided, $40,000,000 shall be provided to the Denali Commission as a direct lump payment pursuant to Public Law 106-113, of which $10,000,000 shall be for a psychiatric treatment facility in Bethel, Alaska, $10,000,000 shall be for residential and supportive housing for elders, $2,500,000 shall be for medical and dental equipment for rural clinics, and $5,000,000 shall be for upgrade and construction of shelters for victims of domestic violence and child abuse.

______________________________________________

Instructions to locate this text yourself on-line: Go to: http://thomas.loc.gov

Click on: "Search Bills and Resolutions"

Select: 108th Congress (2003-2004)

Enter Search: H.R.4818

Click on: "Search"

Click on: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)[H.R.4818.ENR]

H.R.4818 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate) - Federal HHS Appropriations Bill (FY 2005)


    [ To see roll call votes in US House and US Senate, click on:
    Link to the "Bill Summary & Status" file. ]


Scroll about 40% of the way down the page:

DIVISION F--DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES

Continue scrolling, click on:

TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Under:

Health Resources and Services Administration

Health Resources and Services

"Provided further, That of the funds made available under this heading, $288,283,000 shall be for the program under title X of the Public Health Service Act to provide for voluntary family planning projects:..."



CONTACT:
Steve Lefemine, pro-life missionary
dir., Columbia Christians for Life
803-765-0916
www.christiansforlife.net
Columbia, SC
CCFL@sc-online.net



PRESS RELEASE FILE

TODAY'S NEWS
   Murder by Abortion    Freedom of Speech    Court News Report    Politics    Abominations

Source: http://www.covenantnews.com/lefemine050208.htm

214 posted on 03/26/2005 3:32:41 AM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of The Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

Heavenly Father - Help us to trust in Thee. Help Thou mine unbelief.


215 posted on 03/26/2005 3:40:39 AM PST by Saundra Duffy ("Where there's life, there's hope." Theresa Marie SCHINDLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
Since his party is in control of both houses of Congress there is virtually no chance that he would have been impeached let alone removed for such a brave and just act as this

Do you seriously believe there are 34 pro-life Senators who would vote "nay" on Articles of Impeachment?

I don't think there are 15.

216 posted on 03/26/2005 3:44:43 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The would not impeach if only for party loyalty and to stop the dems from rebounding.

And yes there may be less than 15 real Pro-Life senators.
217 posted on 03/26/2005 3:52:04 AM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of The Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
The would not impeach if only for party loyalty

Their loyalty to process liberalism overlying moral relativism may well be stronger.

218 posted on 03/26/2005 4:06:17 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

OK We'll never know. He should do it because it's the right thing to do.

More to the point, What say you about:
President George W. Bush and the Republican-majority Congress Increased Title X to record $288.3 million in FY 2005 on 12/8/04 at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1322034/posts?page=214#214


219 posted on 03/26/2005 4:18:50 AM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of The Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
More to the point, What say you about: President George W. Bush and the Republican-majority Congress Increased Title X to record $288.3 million in FY 2005 on 12/8/04

I say that the Culture of Death still repels most Americans, but that the assumptions which give rise to the Culture of Death are overwhelmingly popular.

What's a poor politician to do?

220 posted on 03/26/2005 4:24:13 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson