To: hattend
One thing that is bothering about this particular confirmation is all the talk about the filibuster that there has been. If I recall, "our" position has been that filibuster is anathema to the judge confirmation process. With the dems attempt at "filibustering" failing my sense is that conservatives have been lulled into unwittingly giving more legitimacy to the concept of filibustering a judicial nominee.
Does anyone else see it this way or am I off in conspiracy land---again. (Shucks, I swore I was going to stop the paranoia).
To: SolomoninSouthDakota
more legitimacy to the concept of filibustering a judicial nominee
Well put me in tin foil hat land too then. I hate the fact that this is STILL considered legitimate. It should of been nuked 3 years ago.
138 posted on
01/30/2006 1:58:26 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
To: SolomoninSouthDakota
With the dems attempt at "filibustering" failing my sense is that conservatives have been lulled into unwittingly giving more legitimacy to the concept of filibustering a judicial nominee. I agree with this. I have the same sense of unease about it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson