Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FAIRTAX CALCULATOR - WHAT WILL FAIRTAX COST YOU PERSONALLY?
FairTax Calculator | Marlene Tobin

Posted on 09/11/2006 2:38:16 PM PDT by witchypooy

FAIRTAX CALCULATOR

www.fairtaxcalculator.org

Do you have questions on what FairTax will cost your family? Have doubts about it's progressiveness? Worried it will place an unfair burden on the poor, the middle class, the young or the seniors?

Time to put the hype aside and stop listening to all the spin. Why not just find out exactly what FairTax will mean to your own personal bottom line? It's easy. Just go to the FairTax Calculator, input your gross income. Approximate your 8 "fair tax deductions" which represent your yearly tax free spending. Give your family size to determine your "monthly prebate". In 10 easy lines the fairtax calculator will calculate for you just what you would pay annually in FairTax considering your spending habits and number of dependents. The calculator will show your net effect annual FairTax percentage rate, the dollar amount of fairtax you would pay on your income, and the amount of your family's monthly fairtax prebate under HR 25.

No one will pay 23% net effective annual rate because of the prebate factor. Actually, many will pay well under 15%, while MOST will see a reduction in taxes over what they pay today for income tax plus 7.65% social security taxes. More importantly, by personally controlling one's own spending/savings habits, ALL will have more control over the amount of sales tax they pay, effecting what their own bottom line FairTax rate will be. ALL will see the IRS out of their personal life, and freedom and privacy restored!

Exact figures are not needed. Approximations will give you a very good picture of the Fair "sales" Tax system's effect on your personal tax burden. Then, just take these FairTax figures and compare them to your current income tax bill to the IRS, using your pay stubs showing current withholding, or last year's Income tax figures (income tax + Social Security FICA withholding). Then if you like, you can also figure a FLAT 24.65% on your annual income to determine what you would pay in tax under any of the current Flat Tax Proposals (17% income tax + 7.65% FICA social security). Isn't FairTax less complicated than the current IRS income tax? Wouldn't FairTax be less costly to you than any proposed "Flat Tax"?

Young, old, retired, unemployed, self employed, student. No matter who you are or what situation you are in, there is a good chance that your bottom line under FairTax will be smaller. How? By broadening the tax base and taxing ALL those spending money in the U.S., including legal and non legal residents, the underground economy, those earning a living through criminal activities, those currently evading taxes, those using loopholes to avoid taxes, those tourists using our services. When all pay, the burden for each of us is lowered. That's the "fair" in FairTax.

Put your doubts aside. Take the time to check out the FairTax Calculator. It's easy, it's fast, and it's totally anonymous! All hype aside, the numbers show the true story so you be the judge.

Check it out!

Marlene
fairtaxsupportpa@aol.com
Pittsburgh


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fairtax; hr25; nationalsalestax; socialsecurity; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: Your Nightmare

Am family of 4 with a $25,000 income will have an effective FairTax rate of -1.29% (-$322 or a benefit to them of $322) even with zero tax free deductions (which is not possible in the real world). With a normal complement of tax free purchases, the rate will be an even greater negative value - meaning they'll have even a greater benefit. That can be seen easily even without the Calculator since the prebate is greater than the income that will be spent.


41 posted on 09/13/2006 8:40:35 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pigdog; Your Nightmare
the prebate is greater than the income that will be spent.
LOL! I thought it was a "refund of taxes paid". Instead you've confirmed what we all knew to be true, it's an entitlement.

What a maroon!

42 posted on 09/13/2006 9:11:25 PM PDT by lewislynn (Fairtax = lies, hope, wishful thinking, conjecture and lack of logic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
The prebate is a refund of taxes. It is not conditioned upon the taxes paid (or not), but strictly upon family size. It is a tax refund, not an entitlement.

I'm sure you'll be interested to know that a 59th backer in the house has signed onto HR25 - Goode of VA

Just keeps growing ... and growing ... and growing ...

43 posted on 09/14/2006 3:06:36 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare
See #41 for your answer. I believe that at present the FairTax Calculator may hiccup when the taxpayer has a negative tax rate and this has been reported to the PAfairtax folks,

Those of you who have a negative effective rate under the FairTax may not be seeing the correct answer and those seeing large effective rates may need to re-check once the Calculator is known to be fixed. I'll try to let everyone know when it is.

44 posted on 09/14/2006 3:13:30 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

He's asking a bit of a different question which is answered correctly in #41.


45 posted on 09/14/2006 3:17:07 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare

Answered in #41.


46 posted on 09/14/2006 3:17:52 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

I believe the poster was answering a different question than was asked by your friend. The answer is in #41.


47 posted on 09/14/2006 3:19:51 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stultorum

It;s possible you have a negative tax rate - see the comment in #44 about that.


48 posted on 09/14/2006 3:21:23 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: stultorum
If you'll send by Private Mail the parameters you used in the Calculator numbered as in the Calculator (along with the family size information) I'll independently check them and return the correct figure to you.
49 posted on 09/14/2006 3:24:19 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TN4Liberty
Would you be willing - under a promise of anonymity of the data - to Private Mail the parameters to me that you used in Questions 1-8 of the Calculator as well as the family information used (M2K, etc.)?

I'd like to see what sort of comparative data is being obtained from the Calculator (I use an independent method of deriving the data). If I have further questions (or other comments) I'll respond to you by PM also. I would expect reciprocal confidentiality from you also.

50 posted on 09/14/2006 4:06:46 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proudofthesouth
Would you be willing - under a promise of anonymity of the data and results - to Private Mail the parameters to me that you used in Questions 1-8 of the Calculator as well as the family information used (M2K, etc.)? It would help to calibrate the Calculator with live data.

I'd like to see what sort of comparative data is being obtained from the Calculator (I use an independent method of deriving the results). If I have further questions (or other comments) I'll respond to you by PM also. I would expect reciprocal confidentiality from you also.

51 posted on 09/14/2006 4:10:50 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Would you be willing - under a promise of anonymity of the data - to Private Mail the parameters to me that you used in Questions 1-8 of the Calculator as well as the family information used (M2K, etc.)?

I'd like to see what sort of comparative data is being obtained from the Calculator (I use an independent method of deriving the data). If I have further questions (or other comments) I'll respond to you by PM also. I would expect reciprocal confidentiality from you also.

52 posted on 09/14/2006 4:12:14 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Am family of 4 with a $25,000 income will have an effective FairTax rate of -1.29% (-$322 or a benefit to them of $322) even with zero tax free deductions (which is not possible in the real world). With a normal complement of tax free purchases, the rate will be an even greater negative value - meaning they'll have even a greater benefit. That can be seen easily even without the Calculator since the prebate is greater than the income that will be spent.
Sorry, pigdog. I asked to see "how a family of 4 can get $25,000 worth of stuff tax free under the FairTax." You didn't do that. Show me the spending and the tax. Let's see the math (errr.... arithmetic).
53 posted on 09/14/2006 6:07:30 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
The prebate is a refund of taxes. It is not conditioned upon the taxes paid (or not), but strictly upon family size. It is a tax refund, not an entitlement.
How can you say it's a refund just two posts after claiming somebody has a negative tax rate? If it's a refund, the lowest tax rate possible would be 0%.
54 posted on 09/14/2006 6:11:26 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Answered in #41.
No it wasn't.
55 posted on 09/14/2006 6:12:15 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
If you'll send by Private Mail the parameters you used in the Calculator numbered as in the Calculator (along with the family size information) I'll independently check them and return the correct figure to you.
Pigdog is now check other's math (I mean "arithmetic"). This is too funny! Will you post your "spreadsheet listing" when you are done?
56 posted on 09/14/2006 6:15:30 AM PDT by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: witchypooy
Under FairTax the poor can save what they can, possibly from a 2nd job, but save it totally tax free, in order to buy their way out of poverty, gain property, and provide a better life style for their family. Savings is NOT taxed as a new good or service.

With the FairTax added to big ticket items for the poor like like child care (can't buy used child care) and losing the income tax deduction, I'm not sure the working poor are going to be better off.

Rent and food are also big expense for the poor and the FairTax is added to those also.

The Social Security FICA tax system is the most REGRESSIVE tax against the poor that has ever been devised in the world, taxing the poor at 7.65% while taxing those over $92,000 in income a less and less net effective tax rate as their pay goes up, as they pay nothing on that portion of their income over $92,000.

Again, you are forgetting the effect of the earned income tax credit.

57 posted on 09/14/2006 6:56:50 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: livius
I like being independent, but they tax you so punitively and deal with you so harshly you really wonder if it's worth it.

What makes you think that owning your own business under the FairTax would be any different? If you collect the sales tax, you get special notice from the taxing agency. If you don't sell your product or service to the public, you still need a certificate to avoid paying the FairTax on what you buy for your business. That also makes you subject to examination.

As the bill is written, I'm not sure how many of us will ultimately escape the scrutiny of the taxing authority.

Below is a link to a discussion of how to determine whether or not a tree is "used" under the FairTax.

http://www.fairtaxindiana.net/main/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=163

The FairTax authority will use snitches to identify tax evaders. Imagine that your neighbor is annoyed with you because your dog always barks at the mailman at the exact time he's taking his afternoon nape, and besides that, he's jealous that you just made a few, easy bucks, so he calls in an anonymous tip. He says that the tree you just sold, sans tax, was really a "new" tree and you don't have the original receipt to prove that the tree was indeed, "used".

The devil is in the details, as the saying goes.

58 posted on 09/14/2006 7:39:44 AM PDT by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare
That's something you should be able to easily tell yourself.

If there is $25,000 spendable income, spending it would result is a cash register paid sales tax PRICE paid of $25.000 including $5,750 in FairTax. With a prebate of $6,072 the taxpayer is $322 better off overall. The actual COST to the taxpayer under the FairTax would be $322 less than $25,000 for the $25,000 purchase of stuff. He'd have the $25,000 worth of stuff plus $322 in his pocket. To the taxpayer, that is tax-free or better since no tax came out of his pocket but actually went into it.

In fact the taxpayer will be even better off since we didn't even factor in the effect of the decreased prices to start with which, I'm sure you recall, we agreed was a 9% price decrease when the income tax was removed. This would allow the taxpayer to buy a good bit MORE THAN what would have been $25,000 worth of "stuff" under the income tax - and which the taxpayer there would have to have earned about $26,500 to buy under that tax.

In other words compared to the income tax situation, the taxpayer has increased purchasing power and is much better off - and that's where the rubber meets the road.

59 posted on 09/14/2006 7:46:48 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare
Just as in #43 when I said:

"The prebate is a refund of taxes. It is not conditioned upon the taxes paid (or not), but strictly upon family size. "

It's not conditioned upon taxes paid or not paid so there's no "lowest possible tax rate" of 0% as you say. The taxpayer has a negative tax rate as stated and as shown in the example since he gets extra funds from the prebate that he would not otherwise have.

60 posted on 09/14/2006 7:52:28 AM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson