Try nearly 0% --
100% effective would mean that there are no armed criminals. Somehow that hasn't happened.
Spunkets cries "Ridiculous!":
You're simply ignoring the fact that the IBC applies to the legal market only.
Amusing wordgaming, seeing that the rational objection to the "instant check' is that it infringes on the rights of only "legal" buyers.
You lawyerly types are so caught up in your own bizarrely 'clever' applications of language, -- that you no longer understand common english law or logic.
It was a conclusion based on faulty logic, thus irrational.
"Amusing wordgaming, seeing that the rational objection to the "instant check' is that it infringes on the rights of only "legal" buyers."
You never were able to explain how an instant background check infringes on any right. At most all anyone can show is that it's a petty inconvenience. That inconvenience is justified by the fact that the instant background check is near 100% effetive in excluding disqualified felons and crazies from the legal market. It's a moral thing that most people are happy to see accomplished.
"You lawyerly types are so caught up in your own bizarrely 'clever' applications of language, -- that you no longer understand common english law or logic."
Amazing! How about this language? You couldn't find your ass if it was handed to ya.